From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44170) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHYjc-00053W-Q3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 10:13:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHYjZ-0003WW-Gv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 10:13:48 -0500 Received: from s16892447.onlinehome-server.info ([82.165.15.123]:41126) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHYjZ-0003WR-AI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 10:13:45 -0500 References: <1447437247-19512-1-git-send-email-mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> <1447437247-19512-2-git-send-email-mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> <568FC8DB.7040308@ilande.co.uk> From: Mark Cave-Ayland Message-ID: <568FD20F.8040007@ilande.co.uk> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 15:13:19 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] sun4u: split out NPT and INT_DIS into separate CPUTimer fields List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: QEMU Developers , Artyom Tarasenko On 08/01/16 14:55, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 8 January 2016 at 14:34, Mark Cave-Ayland > wrote: >> I'm not particularly worried about sun4u for the moment as there are >> already other reasons why migration would fail, e.g. no >> VMStateDescription for storing PCI interrupt state in the apb host bridge. >> >> Last time I checked sun4m migration appeared to work under some very >> light testing, so as long as this behaviour is preserved then I don't >> see a problem. > > OK. Does this apply to all 64-bit SPARC CPUs? (There are some > things I can simplify in the CPU migration code if we can break > 64-bit migration.) Yes, seems reasonable to me - I'm fairly sure that sun4u migration is incomplete so I'd be amazed if anyone were successfully using this out in the field. ATB, Mark.