From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hpe.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
Jesse Gross <jesse@kernel.org>
Cc: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com,
Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/5] net: vxlan: enable local checksum offload
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 13:36:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56902BF8.6080004@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKgT0UcbH-BVbGxOuKx2EeX_Z5SgV8fdhDRjgoSC2eQTDjxNmQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 01/08/2016 01:22 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> and we don't require the remote end to validate the outer checksum.
Doesn't the UDP specification require validating a non-zero checksum on
receipt?
rick jones
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-08 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-07 17:10 [PATCH v2 net-next 0/5] Local Checksum Offload Edward Cree
2016-01-07 17:12 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 1/5] net: local checksum offload for encapsulation Edward Cree
2016-01-07 17:22 ` David Laight
2016-01-07 17:54 ` Edward Cree
2016-01-07 18:42 ` Tom Herbert
2016-01-07 22:53 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-01-08 15:32 ` Edward Cree
2016-01-08 17:30 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-01-07 17:12 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 2/5] net: enable LCO for udp_tunnel_handle_offloads() users Edward Cree
2016-01-07 17:12 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 3/5] net: vxlan: enable local checksum offload Edward Cree
2016-01-08 0:15 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-01-08 15:33 ` Edward Cree
2016-01-08 3:46 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-01-08 15:39 ` Edward Cree
2016-01-08 18:03 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-01-08 19:40 ` Jesse Gross
2016-01-08 21:22 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-01-08 21:36 ` Rick Jones [this message]
2016-01-08 22:07 ` Tom Herbert
2016-01-11 17:24 ` Jesse Gross
2016-01-11 17:55 ` Tom Herbert
2016-01-11 18:27 ` Edward Cree
2016-01-11 18:43 ` Tom Herbert
2016-01-07 17:13 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 4/5] fou: enable LCO in FOU and GUE Edward Cree
2016-01-07 18:51 ` Tom Herbert
2016-01-07 19:00 ` Edward Cree
2016-01-07 17:14 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 5/5] Documentation/networking: add tx-offloads.txt to explain LCO Edward Cree
2016-01-07 18:58 ` Tom Herbert
2016-01-11 17:05 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] Rework of "net: local checksum offload for encapsulation" Alexander Duyck
2016-01-11 17:06 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] net: local checksum offload for encapsulation Alexander Duyck
2016-01-11 17:06 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] net: Add support for UDP local checksum offload as a part of tunnel segmentation Alexander Duyck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56902BF8.6080004@hpe.com \
--to=rick.jones2@hpe.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ecree@solarflare.com \
--cc=jesse@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom@herbertland.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.