From: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@alibaba-inc.com>,
Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] build: convert NR_CPUS to Kconfig
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 09:06:29 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5693C4F5.8060002@cardoe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5693C91C02000078000C572F@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 554 bytes --]
On 1/11/16 8:24 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 09.01.16 at 00:17, <cardoe@cardoe.com> wrote:
>> This converts the usage of NR_CPUS / MAX_PHYS_CPUS to Kconfig as
>> CONFIG_NR_CPUS.
>
> Considering the size of the patch, the doubling of the identifier's
> length, and the fact that even Linux continues to use NR_CPUS
> I wonder whether we wouldn't be better of simply having
>
> #define NR_CPUS CONFIG_NR_CPUS
>
> Jan
>
Is that a "please do this for a v2" or "what do the other maintainers
think?" statement?
--
Doug Goldstein
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 959 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-11 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-08 23:17 [PATCH 1/2] build: introduce CONFIG_NR_CPUS in Kconfig Doug Goldstein
2016-01-08 23:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] build: convert NR_CPUS to Kconfig Doug Goldstein
2016-01-09 14:36 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-01-11 14:24 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-11 15:06 ` Doug Goldstein [this message]
2016-01-11 15:30 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-11 15:49 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-01-09 13:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] build: introduce CONFIG_NR_CPUS in Kconfig Andrew Cooper
2016-01-11 14:15 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5693C4F5.8060002@cardoe.com \
--to=cardoe@cardoe.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=jinsong.liu@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.