Re: [PATCH] xen/spinlock: Use mnemonics for recursive spinlock sentinel values

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>]

On 11/01/16 14:19, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 09.01.16 at 15:33, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> --- a/xen/common/spinlock.c
>> +++ b/xen/common/spinlock.c
>> @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ int _spin_trylock_recursive(spinlock_t *lock)
>>      unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>>  
>>      /* Don't allow overflow of recurse_cpu field. */
>> -    BUILD_BUG_ON(NR_CPUS > 0xfffu);
>> +    BUILD_BUG_ON(NR_CPUS >= SPINLOCK_NO_CPU);
> ">" (see also the reply to Doug's patch 1/2)

So it is.

As there is no bug, I will resubmit the cleanup when the NR_CPUS series
is in to avoid causing patch conflicts.

~Andrew