From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mason Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] always probe UART HW when options are not specified Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 23:26:19 +0100 Message-ID: <56957D8B.3080906@free.fr> References: <5672D18E.8000301@laposte.net> <5672E2CF.6080705@hurleysoftware.com> <5672E76A.3010506@laposte.net> <5672F588.8070503@hurleysoftware.com> <5672FD35.5070609@laposte.net> <56731689.70702@hurleysoftware.com> <56740FC3.50302@laposte.net> <5674204C.1000907@hurleysoftware.com> <56782DE5.7090708@laposte.net> <56798EC7.1030804@laposte.net> <5693C52B.90003@laposte.net> <5693D41E.8050601@hurleysoftware.com> <5693ECBA.50003@laposte.net> <5693FD3C.5080601@hurleysoftware.com> <5694C94B.3090405@free.fr> <56950C21.3010805@laposte.net> <5695584E.3040902@hurleysoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5695584E.3040902@hurleysoftware.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Hurley Cc: Sebastian Frias , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Mans Rullgard List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On 12/01/2016 20:47, Peter Hurley wrote: > I expect that patch to go into -next sometime during the 4.5-rc cycle. Do you mean the "Add Au1x00/RT288x earlycon support" patch? I find it strange that you have rt288x_putc while also using AU1x00_FOO. Seems like mixing naming styles. Did you see my post about the underlying IP block? Might be appropriate to use that name there? Regards.