All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vasco Steinmetz <linux@kyberraum.net>
To: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Slow performance of Odroid XU4 - cpufreq-dt patch needed?
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 17:16:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56967861.10305@kyberraum.net> (raw)

Hello,

I'm trying to get an Odroid XU4 to run a more recent (e.g. 4.4+) kernel
than the last semiofficial 4.2 port from hardkernel (which doesn't boot
here at all).

Currently (thanks to a lot of patches from you guys) the board boots
happily with a kernel build from linux-next.

Nonetheless the CPU performance is rather poor, though all 8 cores are
enabled (no b/l switcher).

It seems to me the Cortex A15s are running in their slowest performance
mode (that is: lowest clock).
I don't know a way to read the core clocks, as no cpufreq driver is working.
Tried that also with exynos_defconfig, but with the same effect.


My question therefore is:

Is Bartlomiej's cpufreq-dt patchset for exynos54xx (last update was
mid-December) necessary to obtain the full performance on the 5422?

Unfortunately I can't get that patchset to work with the linux-next from
within the last two weeks.
If there's an update I would volunteer to test it thoroughly (by
compiling Gentoo on it ;) on the XU4.


Another point:

The XU4's SD card controller supports UHS mode (tested by booting the
original ubuntu with an ancient 3.x kernel on the emmc flash and reading
from a UHS SD card), the current linux mainline kernel (4.4+) apparently
doesn't either detect or enable UHS mode. The maximum SD speed is around
20MB/s instead of the 90MB/s the card supports and was shown with the
test above.

Is there patch available (maybe some missing dt clock or flag to enable
UHS)?


Kind regards,
Vasco

             reply	other threads:[~2016-01-13 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-13 16:16 Vasco Steinmetz [this message]
2016-01-13 17:16 ` Slow performance of Odroid XU4 - cpufreq-dt patch needed? Ben Gamari
2016-01-14 17:17   ` Vasco Steinmetz
2016-01-14  5:38 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-01-14 17:30   ` Vasco Steinmetz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56967861.10305@kyberraum.net \
    --to=linux@kyberraum.net \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.