From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 60FFCE00B5A; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 09:07:42 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high * trust * [192.55.52.88 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACAC5E008EE for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 09:07:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Jan 2016 09:07:01 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,290,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="632883469" Received: from alimonb-mobl1.zpn.intel.com (HELO [10.219.5.151]) ([10.219.5.151]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Jan 2016 09:06:59 -0800 To: Jussi Kukkonen , Anibal Limon References: <37b747fd-ad90-45e9-b3cc-4595c4d83661@fmsmsx108.amr.corp.intel.com> From: =?UTF-8?B?QW7DrWJhbCBMaW3Ds24=?= X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56968498.5070207@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 11:08:40 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: Yocto Project Subject: Re: [AUH] gpgme: upgrading to 1.6.0 SUCCEEDED X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 17:07:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Jussi, Thanks for the feedback, comments below... Cheers, alimon On 01/13/2016 07:42 AM, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > Hi, > > On 11 January 2016 at 06:21, wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> You are receiving this email because you are the maintainer >> of *gpgme* recipe and this is to let you know that the automatic attempt >> to upgrade the recipe to *1.6.0* has Succeeded. >> > > > First, thanks for the effort Anibal, the upgrade helper is looking very > useful: I'm certainly going to use it. > > Couple of small issues: > * The license diffs do not seem correct: they look like like diffs between > an empty file and the new license file version (see the parent gpgme post > for example) Yes i see, i'll review/fix the problem. > * Is the decision to use "buildhistory-diff -a" intentional? I'm not 100% > sure what exactly "-a" option brings with it but I've usually avoided it on > upgrades because the path changes in -dbg package are so verbose as to > hide everything else... It was mine decision for provide more output for the maintainers but if you think that's enough without -a that's ok. May be a good idea will be to sent two files one, - buildhistory-diff.txt: Without -a. - buildhistory-diff-all.txt: With -a/ Comments? > > Thanks, > Jussi > > >> *LICENSE CHANGED* please review the gpgme.h.in.diff file and update the >> LICENSE >> variable in the recipe if is needed. >> >> The recipe has been successfully compiled for machines qemux86, >> qemux86-64, qemuarm, qemumips, qemuppc. >> >> Next steps: >> - apply the patch: git am 0001-gpgme-upgrade-to-1.6.0.patch >> - check that required upstream patches have not been commented from >> the recipe, >> if upstream patches were commented the reason is specified in the >> commit message. >> - compile an image that contains the package >> - perform some basic sanity tests >> - amend the patch and sign it off: git commit -s --reset-author --amend >> - send it to the list >> >> Attached are the patch, license diff (if change) and bitbake log. >> Any problem please contact Anibal Limon . >> >> Regards, >> The Upgrade Helper > > >