From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: OMAPDSS: panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01: update to use gpiod
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 09:44:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <569751E5.40204@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160113232230.GQ12600@atomide.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2094 bytes --]
Hi Tony,
On 14/01/16 01:22, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> [151223 23:29]:
>> [ It's weird that I'm just now getting this warning from 2014... Oh
>> well, looks legit. -dan ]
>
> Sorry for the delay on this one, got distracted few times with
> other bugs to deal with. This seems like a valid warning yeah.
>
> Tomi, do we really need two copies of the the same panels
> files in kernel?
>
> For example:
>
> $ find . -name panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.c
> ./drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.c
> ./drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.c
Strictly no, but I think this is the best way forward. Longer story:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.dri.devel/143151
>> The patch 9522f9fe86f9: "OMAPDSS: panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01: update to
>> use gpiod" from Apr 28, 2014, leads to the following static checker
>> warning:
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.c:213 sharp_ls_get_gpio()
>> warn: 'gd' isn't an ERR_PTR
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.c
>> 200 static int sharp_ls_get_gpio(struct device *dev, int gpio, unsigned long flags,
>> 201 char *desc, struct gpio_desc **gpiod)
>> 202 {
>> 203 struct gpio_desc *gd;
>> 204 int r;
>> 205
>> 206 *gpiod = NULL;
>> 207
>> 208 r = devm_gpio_request_one(dev, gpio, flags, desc);
>> 209 if (r)
>> 210 return r == -ENOENT ? 0 : r;
>> 211
>> 212 gd = gpio_to_desc(gpio);
>> 213 if (IS_ERR(gd))
>> 214 return PTR_ERR(gd) == -ENOENT ? 0 : PTR_ERR(gd);
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> gd can be an ERR_PTR if gpio_to_desc is defined out but it's never
>> -ENOENT.
>
> Seems like we can just remove the check for -ENOENT here.
Yep. Writing a patch for this and the other panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01
error Dan reported is on my todo.
Tomi
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-14 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-24 7:29 OMAPDSS: panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01: update to use gpiod Dan Carpenter
2016-01-13 23:22 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-01-14 7:44 ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2016-01-14 16:45 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=569751E5.40204@ti.com \
--to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.