From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 5A5CFE00BE8; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 07:28:28 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.192.177 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mail-pf0-f177.google.com (mail-pf0-f177.google.com [209.85.192.177]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B2CE008C8 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 07:28:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf0-f177.google.com with SMTP id 65so101328742pff.2 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 07:28:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mvista-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3oNq29rKNEQTtxCSaTrcWt2SztH4SGhc4cfueJJVrH4=; b=a6drIXuMe1tvmgBZfZ+daAyu5NNczpZmiCV3tEfsjGGJfNnBaT0KRDmQAf6sHuf66Q wcbBAUeYUfDK3z1KcPhBcZrh2SOxizZd1BEFe6mcVkaBG+RWMdAxcuXMQGo7VMgckGIV xMOci1yhX5/i3fJPpqTQ/TaFuP6ZsGw822zrsYwGSduWzvQ6O6PpmkuTBmB0Q3hEPB+y 2r1SLskIDZCCkO5W1tvWXNOPAQJZPxiS1SGiIr2oI8jN8cKXCHC+Ud4ch5Tf5Inj1fbg yiQ+f/qKMmJ2gJA0cSxaSqLGp8LRHtIdkAtAIpHllwYCWFJt6a8mrEr8DHarZ4qdR6PP sVoA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3oNq29rKNEQTtxCSaTrcWt2SztH4SGhc4cfueJJVrH4=; b=mKrNeYLy7mvrCdamunbZmoLayEK1YRz1r8rn4xcdxb96mY3BCtcEuMcUgb2nznf/8U SIPph+j1RPKZjJ5F/idkil3SMaapNdGVhQ6e5ctvprf1D6i6ckt1G6nRxxeIYKkc0799 64wx+nq3Gt48xWBk8zeGsIGhJJYkaPtjGFfZnh2S5VePkXsj6HW1pSKO5fHg0lWWG7MJ LyKhfg6ONO/S+2xegLxW5SpJsMyW1PY7dPYaZzjlVnxsu3te0TGuotcpC85fyU8uErBv LLT1V47kgyZwDLZ9J5vt92ghVMT7tl+b/nmVucL1eB7n0GIGPuA/Sjw5J8BprU4Psxcf O+Rg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkzB27pvPBDuUiNndIo3W2K0owaFsfExOrtwtr8hE34auZguKAMSMFfcJbFXmjsVjBN1kS83VvFpe6V0hXoDcd+jzmBdw== X-Received: by 10.98.14.80 with SMTP id w77mr6805061pfi.152.1452785305364; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 07:28:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:202:4000:1239:a166:4370:9f55:ef0b? ([2601:202:4000:1239:a166:4370:9f55:ef0b]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id w9sm656118pfi.72.2016.01.14.07.28.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 14 Jan 2016 07:28:24 -0800 (PST) To: "Reshetova, Elena" , "yocto@yoctoproject.org" References: <2236FBA76BA1254E88B949DDB74E612B41A4F981@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> From: akuster X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <5697BE96.5020603@mvista.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 07:28:22 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2236FBA76BA1254E88B949DDB74E612B41A4F981@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> Subject: Re: Package naming "exceptions" in Yocto X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 15:28:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/13/2016 11:43 PM, Reshetova, Elena wrote: > Hi, > > > > I have a small question about "exceptional" names of packages in yocto/OE. > Kernel package is being one example with the name "linux-yocto" vs. > traditional "linux_kernel". Since you ask about "Yocto" naming in the Poky distribution I have the following comments: The Reference to "Yocto" should only be in terms of the project. The Soures you refer to in support of the "Poky" distro. > > Are there more such yocto-specific packages (of course excluding FW and > other bsp-related packages)? A look over the package list didn't reveal any, > but I wanted to double check. The Yocto project should not have any specific packages. Its "Poky". In fact in the last OEDAME it was decided to rename the meta-yocto* layers to meta-poky*. I was hoping would have been changed by now. People are saying "Yocto linux" which is wrong. Its the Yocto Project which has a test distro named "Poky". Just ask Phil B. > > > > The reason I am asking is that in case when we try to determine the package > CVEs against the NVD database, in these particular exception cases, we > probably want to check not only "linux-yocto", but also "linux_kernel" open > package CVEs with regards to specified version to make sure we cover as much > as we can. There may be a need to have a mapping for upstream names to packages named within OE. They may not all be 1:1. Or in the case of someone outside the project runs this in there distro they can. regards, Armin > > > > Best Regards, > Elena. > > > > > >