From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laszlo Ersek Subject: Re: [SeaBIOS] [SEABIOS] Plans for either 1.9.1 or 1.10.0? Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:14:45 +0100 Message-ID: <5697D785.7010608@redhat.com> References: <1452783019.2185.43.camel@citrix.com> <1452789411.19513.58.camel@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1452789411.19513.58.camel@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum , seabios@seabios.org, Ian Campbell , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 01/14/16 17:36, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On Do, 2016-01-14 at 14:50 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: >> Hello, >> >> The xen.git development branch currently points to SeaBIOS rel-1.9.0, but >> Roger has tripped over a build issue which is fixed by 3b8c5378dfe2 "build: >> fix typo in buildversion.py". >> >> Is there any plan for either a 1.9.1 or a 1.10.0 in the near future which >> would include this, so I can roll forward to that? > > 1.10 will take a while ... > >> Or if not a 1.9.1 release perhaps for now just a 1.9-stable branch could be >> created? > > 1.9-stable created now, with the patch above cherry-picked. > > Doing 1.9.1 soonish (next week maybe) is fine with me. If someone would > like to see other patches backported to 1.9-stable please speak up now. It's been suggested (by you :)) that 76327b9f32a009245c215f4a3c5d58a01b5310ae be cherry-picked into 1.9.1 as well, perhaps. Just raising it here, should you have forgotten. Also copying Marcel. Thanks Laszlo