From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dongsheng Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpu subsystem for unified hierarchy. Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 08:44:09 +0800 Message-ID: <569840D9.8050302@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1452674420-31603-1-git-send-email-yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <20160114215749.GE3520@mtj.duckdns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160114215749.GE3520-qYNAdHglDFBN0TnZuCh8vA@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Tejun Heo Cc: cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org On 01/15/2016 05:57 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Dongsheng. > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 04:40:18PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote: >> Hi TJ, >> When I want to improve cpuacct subsystem, you said we are going >> to combine cpuacct and cpu subsystem. Then I am here to try to implement >> cpu subsystem in unified hierarchy and squash cpuacct in it. > > There's already a patchset pending. > > http://lkml.kernel.org/g/20160105164758.GD5995-qYNAdHglDFBN0TnZuCh8vA@public.gmane.org Oops, I found I lost the emails in cgroup list recently, so I did not get your patch about it. Sorry for the duplication about this work. I will find back what I lost these days and figure out what I should do based on your work. Thanx Yang > > Thanks. >