All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 7/9] efi_loader: Add disk interfaces
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 03:40:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56985C35.9080400@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPnjgZ3tE2gQoy6xyCq2m9RsTYdKBHWiMHN1yjU=PVLiUaXWQw@mail.gmail.com>



On 15.01.16 02:37, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
> 
> On 22 December 2015 at 06:57, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> wrote:
>> A EFI applications usually want to access storage devices to load data from.
>>
>> This patch adds support for EFI disk interfaces. It loops through all block
>> storage interfaces known to U-Boot and creates an EFI object for each existing
>> one. EFI applications can then through these objects call U-Boot's read and
>> write functions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
>> ---
>>  include/efi_loader.h      |   1 +
>>  lib/efi_loader/efi_disk.c | 227 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 228 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 lib/efi_loader/efi_disk.c
> 
> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
> 
> Some nits below.
> 
>>
>> diff --git a/include/efi_loader.h b/include/efi_loader.h
>> index af1c88f..7e821e5 100644
>> --- a/include/efi_loader.h
>> +++ b/include/efi_loader.h
>> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ struct efi_object {
>>  };
>>  extern struct list_head efi_obj_list;
>>
>> +int efi_disk_register(void);
>>  efi_status_t efi_return_handle(void *handle,
>>                 efi_guid_t *protocol, void **protocol_interface,
>>                 void *agent_handle, void *controller_handle,
>> diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_disk.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_disk.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..1804e3e
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_disk.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,227 @@
>> +/*
>> + *  EFI application disk support
>> + *
>> + *  Copyright (c) 2015 Alexander Graf
>> + *
>> + *  This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>> + *  modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
>> + *  License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
>> + *  version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
>> + *
>> + *  This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + *  but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + *  MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
>> + *  Lesser General Public License for more details.
>> + *
>> + *  You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
>> + *  License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
>> + *  Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA
>> + *
>> + *  SPDX-License-Identifier:     LGPL-2.1+
> 
> Can we have GPL 2 / 2+? Also drop the text?
> 
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <common.h>
>> +#include <efi_loader.h>
>> +#include <part.h>
>> +#include <malloc.h>
>> +#include <inttypes.h>
> 
> inttypes.h should go above part.h
> 
>> +
>> +static const efi_guid_t efi_block_io_guid = BLOCK_IO_GUID;
>> +
>> +struct efi_disk_obj {
> 
> Could use comments on these members
> 
>> +       struct efi_object parent;
>> +       struct efi_block_io ops;
>> +       const char *ifname;
>> +       int dev_index;
>> +       struct efi_block_io_media media;
>> +       struct efi_device_path_file_path *dp;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void ascii2unicode(u16 *unicode, char *ascii)
>> +{
>> +       while (*ascii)
>> +               *(unicode++) = *(ascii++);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static efi_status_t efi_disk_open_block(void *handle, efi_guid_t *protocol,
>> +                       void **protocol_interface, void *agent_handle,
>> +                       void *controller_handle, uint32_t attributes)
>> +{
>> +       struct efi_disk_obj *diskobj = handle;
>> +
>> +       *protocol_interface = &diskobj->ops;
>> +
>> +       return EFI_SUCCESS;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static efi_status_t efi_disk_open_dp(void *handle, efi_guid_t *protocol,
>> +                       void **protocol_interface, void *agent_handle,
>> +                       void *controller_handle, uint32_t attributes)
>> +{
>> +       struct efi_disk_obj *diskobj = handle;
>> +
>> +       *protocol_interface = diskobj->dp;
>> +
>> +       return EFI_SUCCESS;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static efi_status_t efi_disk_reset(struct efi_block_io *this,
>> +                       char extended_verification)
>> +{
>> +       EFI_ENTRY("%p, %x", this, extended_verification);
>> +       return EFI_EXIT(EFI_DEVICE_ERROR);
>> +}
>> +
>> +enum efi_disk_direction {
>> +       EFI_DISK_READ,
>> +       EFI_DISK_WRITE,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static efi_status_t efi_disk_rw_blocks(struct efi_block_io *this,
>> +                       u32 media_id, u64 lba, unsigned long buffer_size,
>> +                       void *buffer, enum efi_disk_direction direction)
>> +{
>> +       struct efi_disk_obj *diskobj;
>> +       struct block_dev_desc *desc;
>> +       int blksz;
>> +       int blocks;
>> +       unsigned long n;
>> +
>> +       EFI_ENTRY("%p, %x, %"PRIx64", %lx, %p", this, media_id, lba,
>> +                 buffer_size, buffer);
>> +
>> +       diskobj = container_of(this, struct efi_disk_obj, ops);
>> +       if (!(desc = get_dev(diskobj->ifname, diskobj->dev_index)))
>> +               return EFI_EXIT(EFI_DEVICE_ERROR);
>> +       blksz = desc->blksz;
>> +       blocks = buffer_size / blksz;
>> +
>> +#ifdef DEBUG_EFI
>> +       printf("EFI: %s:%d blocks=%x lba=%"PRIx64" blksz=%x dir=%d\n", __func__,
>> +              __LINE__, blocks, lba, blksz, direction);
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +       /* We only support full block access */
>> +       if (buffer_size & (blksz - 1))
>> +               return EFI_EXIT(EFI_DEVICE_ERROR);
>> +
>> +       if (direction == EFI_DISK_READ)
>> +               n = desc->block_read(desc->dev, lba, blocks, buffer);
>> +       else
>> +               n = desc->block_write(desc->dev, lba, blocks, buffer);
>> +
>> +       /* We don't do interrupts, so check for timers cooperatively */
>> +       efi_timer_check();
>> +
>> +#ifdef DEBUG_EFI
>> +       printf("EFI: %s:%d n=%lx blocks=%x\n", __func__, __LINE__, n, blocks);
>> +#endif
>> +       if (n != blocks)
>> +               return EFI_EXIT(EFI_DEVICE_ERROR);
>> +
>> +       return EFI_EXIT(EFI_SUCCESS);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static efi_status_t efi_disk_read_blocks(struct efi_block_io *this,
>> +                       u32 media_id, u64 lba, unsigned long buffer_size,
>> +                       void *buffer)
>> +{
>> +       return efi_disk_rw_blocks(this, media_id, lba, buffer_size, buffer,
>> +                                 EFI_DISK_READ);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static efi_status_t efi_disk_write_blocks(struct efi_block_io *this,
>> +                       u32 media_id, u64 lba, unsigned long buffer_size,
>> +                       void *buffer)
>> +{
>> +       return efi_disk_rw_blocks(this, media_id, lba, buffer_size, buffer,
>> +                                 EFI_DISK_WRITE);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static efi_status_t efi_disk_flush_blocks(struct efi_block_io *this)
>> +{
>> +       /* We always write synchronously */
>> +       return EFI_SUCCESS;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct efi_block_io block_io_disk_template = {
>> +       .reset = &efi_disk_reset,
>> +       .read_blocks = &efi_disk_read_blocks,
>> +       .write_blocks = &efi_disk_write_blocks,
>> +       .flush_blocks = &efi_disk_flush_blocks,
>> +};
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * U-Boot doesn't have a list of all online disk devices. So when running our
>> + * EFI payload, we scan through all of the potentially available ones and
>> + * store them in our object pool.
>> + *
>> + * This gets called from do_bootefi_exec().
>> + */
>> +int efi_disk_register(void)
>> +{
>> +       const char **cur_drvr;
>> +       int i;
>> +       int disks = 0;
>> +
>> +       /* Search for all available disk devices */
>> +       for (cur_drvr = available_block_drvrs; *cur_drvr; cur_drvr++) {
>> +               printf("Scanning disks on %s...\n", *cur_drvr);
>> +               for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
> 
> What is 4 for?

4 disks should be enough for everyone ;).

I couldn't find an easy way to limit the number of devices we have to
scan. You may have 4 MMC slots, but only slot 3 is actually populated.
How do you know how many there really are?

So we have to use some upper bound for the scan. The 4 is simply because
most devices I'm aware of that U-Boot runs on don't have much more than
4 devices per block bus attached to them. I had 128 in here first, but
then I ran into endless timeouts with MMC scans.


Thanks a bunch for the review :)

Alex

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-15  2:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-22 13:57 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support Alexander Graf
2015-12-22 13:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/9] disk/part.c: Expose a list of available block drivers Alexander Graf
2016-01-14 19:18   ` Tom Rini
2016-01-14 23:11   ` Simon Glass
2016-01-14 23:33     ` Alexander Graf
2016-01-15  0:46       ` Simon Glass
2016-01-15  1:04         ` Alexander Graf
2015-12-22 13:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/9] include/efi_api.h: Add more detailed API definitions Alexander Graf
2015-12-22 13:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/9] efi_loader: Add PE image loader Alexander Graf
2015-12-26 16:26   ` Leif Lindholm
2016-01-14 23:45     ` Alexander Graf
2016-01-15 12:29       ` Leif Lindholm
2015-12-22 13:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/9] efi_loader: Add boot time services Alexander Graf
2015-12-22 14:15   ` Andreas Färber
2015-12-22 14:31     ` Alexander Graf
2015-12-26 18:09   ` Leif Lindholm
2016-01-15  0:13     ` Alexander Graf
2016-01-15 13:02       ` Leif Lindholm
2016-01-15 14:14         ` Alexander Graf
2016-01-15 14:21           ` Leif Lindholm
2016-01-15 17:04             ` Alexander Graf
2016-01-15  3:40     ` Alexander Graf
2015-12-22 13:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/9] efi_loader: Add console interface Alexander Graf
2015-12-22 13:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/9] efi_loader: Add runtime services Alexander Graf
2015-12-26 18:33   ` Leif Lindholm
2016-01-15  0:26     ` Alexander Graf
2016-01-15 13:52       ` Leif Lindholm
2016-01-15 14:15         ` Alexander Graf
2016-01-15 14:22           ` Leif Lindholm
2015-12-22 13:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 7/9] efi_loader: Add disk interfaces Alexander Graf
2016-01-15  1:37   ` Simon Glass
2016-01-15  2:40     ` Alexander Graf [this message]
2015-12-22 13:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 8/9] efi_loader: Add "bootefi" command Alexander Graf
2015-12-24 11:15   ` Matwey V. Kornilov
2015-12-25  9:02     ` Alexander Graf
2015-12-25  9:25       ` Andreas Färber
2015-12-25  9:40         ` Matwey V. Kornilov
2015-12-25 17:04           ` Tom Rini
2015-12-26 18:55         ` Leif Lindholm
2015-12-27 15:33           ` Alexander Graf
2015-12-26 18:45       ` Leif Lindholm
2015-12-25 16:58     ` Tom Rini
2015-12-22 13:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 9/9] efi_loader: hook up in build environment Alexander Graf
2015-12-22 18:28 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support Matwey V. Kornilov
2015-12-22 20:32   ` Alexander Graf
2015-12-25  3:29 ` Tom Rini
2015-12-25  8:53   ` Alexander Graf
2015-12-25 16:50     ` Tom Rini
2015-12-25 16:53       ` Matwey V. Kornilov
2015-12-25 17:00         ` Tom Rini
2016-01-15  3:00       ` Alexander Graf
2016-01-15  3:06         ` Tom Rini
2015-12-25 19:34 ` Blibbet
2015-12-26 15:31 ` Leif Lindholm
2015-12-26 16:27   ` Alexander Graf
2015-12-26 19:34     ` Leif Lindholm
2016-01-04 16:25       ` Alexander Graf
2016-01-04 16:56         ` Tom Rini
2016-01-04 18:03           ` Andreas Färber
2016-01-04 18:41             ` Andreas Färber
2016-01-04 19:54               ` Tom Rini
2016-01-04 22:37                 ` Dennis Gilmore
2016-01-04 22:48                   ` Alexander Graf
2016-01-15  3:40             ` Peter Robinson
2016-01-04 20:11           ` Matwey V. Kornilov
2016-01-15  3:32           ` Peter Robinson
2015-12-27 18:10   ` Tom Rini
2015-12-27 18:39     ` Leif Lindholm
2015-12-27 19:48       ` Tom Rini
2016-01-05 20:18       ` Tom Rini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56985C35.9080400@suse.de \
    --to=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.