From: "\"Zhou, Wenjian/周文剑\"" <zhouwj-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: kexec@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Chao Fan <cfan@redhat.com>,
Atsushi Kumagai <ats-kumagai@wm.jp.nec.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Improve the performance of --num-threads -d 31
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 13:09:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <569C7373.60504@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453082405-28847-1-git-send-email-zhouwj-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Hello,
Several weeks ago, we talked about the performance degradation of --num-threads 1.
I found in the origin implementation, handling filtered page and zero page spends more
time than without num-threads.
I think that's why --num-threads 1 is so different from --num-threads 0.
I rewrite the logic in this patch. And the new implementation can resolve the degradation
of -d 31. It can reduce the time of handling filtered page.
But it seems not effective for handling zero page.
--
Thanks
Zhou
On 01/18/2016 10:00 AM, Zhou Wenjian wrote:
> The origin implementation of --num-threads wastes a lot of time
> dealing with the filtered pages. So it has a great performance degradation
> when -d 31 is specified.
> The new implementation is just like the following:
> * The basic idea is producer producing page and consumer writing page.
> * Each producer have a page_flag_buf list which is used for storing page's description.
> * The size of page_flag_buf is little so it won't take too much memory.
> * And all producers will share a page_data_buf array which is used for storing page's compressed data.
> * The main thread is the consumer. It will find the next pfn and write it into file.
> * The next pfn is smallest pfn in all page_flag_buf.
> It won't waste time and memory for filtered page. So it has a good behaviour in -d 31.
>
> Some tests results:
>
> -l -c
> -d 31: 2.6 11.3 (without num-threads)
> num-threads origin new origin new
> 1 13.2 2.9 22.4 13.2
> 2 11.6 2.46 15.3 7.3
> 4 10.4 3.2 12.3 5.7
> -d 0: 32.7 151.2(without num-threads)
> 1 43.3 45.3 158.9 159.4
> 2 21.2 23.0 81.8 83.2
> 4 18.2 21.4 46.1 47.5
>
> These tests are executed in the second kernel with /proc/vmcore.
> ---
> makedumpfile.c | 266 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> makedumpfile.h | 26 +++---
> 2 files changed, 196 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/makedumpfile.c b/makedumpfile.c
> index fa0b779..8cf274b 100644
> --- a/makedumpfile.c
> +++ b/makedumpfile.c
> @@ -3483,7 +3483,8 @@ initial_for_parallel()
> unsigned long page_data_buf_size;
> unsigned long limit_size;
> int page_data_num;
> - int i;
> + struct page_flag *current;
> + int i, j;
>
> len_buf_out = calculate_len_buf_out(info->page_size);
>
> @@ -3562,8 +3563,10 @@ initial_for_parallel()
> - MAP_REGION * info->num_threads) * 0.6;
>
> page_data_num = limit_size / page_data_buf_size;
> + info->num_buffers = 3 * info->num_threads;
>
> - info->num_buffers = MIN(NUM_BUFFERS, page_data_num);
> + info->num_buffers = MAX(info->num_buffers, NUM_BUFFERS);
> + info->num_buffers = MIN(info->num_buffers, page_data_num);
>
> DEBUG_MSG("Number of struct page_data for produce/consume: %d\n",
> info->num_buffers);
> @@ -3588,6 +3591,36 @@ initial_for_parallel()
> }
>
> /*
> + * initial page_flag for each thread
> + */
> + if ((info->page_flag_buf = malloc(sizeof(void *) * info->num_threads))
> + == NULL) {
> + MSG("Can't allocate memory for page_flag_buf. %s\n",
> + strerror(errno));
> + return FALSE;
> + }
> + memset(info->page_flag_buf, 0, sizeof(void *) * info->num_threads);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < info->num_threads; i++) {
> + if ((info->page_flag_buf[i] = malloc(sizeof(struct page_flag))) == NULL) {
> + MSG("Can't allocate memory for page_flag_buf. %s\n",
> + strerror(errno));
> + return FALSE;
> + }
> + current = info->page_flag_buf[i];
> +
> + for (j = 1; j < NUM_BUFFERS; j++) {
> + if ((current->next = calloc(0, sizeof(struct page_flag))) == NULL) {
> + MSG("Can't allocate memory for data of page_data_buf. %s\n",
> + strerror(errno));
> + return FALSE;
> + }
> + current = current->next;
> + }
> + current->next = info->page_flag_buf[i];
> + }
> +
> + /*
> * initial fd_memory for threads
> */
> for (i = 0; i < info->num_threads; i++) {
> @@ -3612,7 +3645,8 @@ initial_for_parallel()
> void
> free_for_parallel()
> {
> - int i;
> + int i, j;
> + struct page_flag *current;
>
> if (info->threads != NULL) {
> for (i = 0; i < info->num_threads; i++) {
> @@ -3655,6 +3689,19 @@ free_for_parallel()
> free(info->page_data_buf);
> }
>
> + if (info->page_flag_buf != NULL) {
> + for (i = 0; i < info->num_threads; i++) {
> + for (j = 0; j < NUM_BUFFERS; j++) {
> + if (info->page_flag_buf[i] != NULL) {
> + current = info->page_flag_buf[i];
> + info->page_flag_buf[i] = current->next;
> + free(current);
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + free(info->page_flag_buf);
> + }
> +
> if (info->parallel_info == NULL)
> return;
>
> @@ -7076,10 +7123,10 @@ kdump_thread_function_cyclic(void *arg) {
> void *retval = PTHREAD_FAIL;
> struct thread_args *kdump_thread_args = (struct thread_args *)arg;
> struct page_data *page_data_buf = kdump_thread_args->page_data_buf;
> + struct page_flag *page_flag_buf = kdump_thread_args->page_flag_buf;
> struct cycle *cycle = kdump_thread_args->cycle;
> - int page_data_num = kdump_thread_args->page_data_num;
> mdf_pfn_t pfn;
> - int index;
> + int index = kdump_thread_args->thread_num;
> int buf_ready;
> int dumpable;
> int fd_memory = 0;
> @@ -7125,47 +7172,48 @@ kdump_thread_function_cyclic(void *arg) {
> kdump_thread_args->thread_num);
> }
>
> - while (1) {
> - /* get next pfn */
> - pthread_mutex_lock(&info->current_pfn_mutex);
> - pfn = info->current_pfn;
> - info->current_pfn++;
> - pthread_mutex_unlock(&info->current_pfn_mutex);
> + /* filtered page won't take anything
> + * unfiltered zero page will only take a page_flag_buf
> + * unfiltered non-zero page will take a page_flag_buf and a page_data_buf
> + */
> + while (page_flag_buf->pfn < kdump_thread_args->end_pfn) {
> + buf_ready = FALSE;
>
> - if (pfn >= kdump_thread_args->end_pfn)
> - break;
> + while (page_data_buf[index].used != 0 ||
> + pthread_mutex_trylock(&page_data_buf[index].mutex) != 0)
> + index = (index + 1) % info->num_buffers;
>
> - index = -1;
> - buf_ready = FALSE;
> + page_data_buf[index].used = 1;
>
> while (buf_ready == FALSE) {
> pthread_testcancel();
> -
> - index = pfn % page_data_num;
> -
> - if (pfn - info->consumed_pfn > info->num_buffers)
> - continue;
> -
> - if (page_data_buf[index].ready != 0)
> + /* 1 means page_flag_buf is ready to be used */
> + if (page_flag_buf->ready == 1)
> continue;
>
> - pthread_mutex_lock(&page_data_buf[index].mutex);
> + /* get next pfn */
> + pthread_mutex_lock(&info->current_pfn_mutex);
> + pfn = info->current_pfn;
> + info->current_pfn++;
> + /* 2 means page_flag_buf is being filled */
> + page_flag_buf->ready = 2;
> + pthread_mutex_unlock(&info->current_pfn_mutex);
>
> - if (page_data_buf[index].ready != 0)
> - goto unlock;
> + page_flag_buf->pfn = pfn;
>
> - buf_ready = TRUE;
> -
> - page_data_buf[index].pfn = pfn;
> - page_data_buf[index].ready = 1;
> + if (pfn >= kdump_thread_args->end_pfn) {
> + page_data_buf[index].used = 0;
> + page_flag_buf->ready = 1;
> + info->current_pfn--;
> + break;
> + }
>
> dumpable = is_dumpable(
> info->fd_bitmap ? &bitmap_parallel : info->bitmap2,
> pfn,
> cycle);
> - page_data_buf[index].dumpable = dumpable;
> if (!dumpable)
> - goto unlock;
> + continue;
>
> if (!read_pfn_parallel(fd_memory, pfn, buf,
> &bitmap_memory_parallel,
> @@ -7178,11 +7226,11 @@ kdump_thread_function_cyclic(void *arg) {
>
> if ((info->dump_level & DL_EXCLUDE_ZERO)
> && is_zero_page(buf, info->page_size)) {
> - page_data_buf[index].zero = TRUE;
> - goto unlock;
> + page_flag_buf->zero = TRUE;
> + goto next;
> }
>
> - page_data_buf[index].zero = FALSE;
> + page_flag_buf->zero = FALSE;
>
> /*
> * Compress the page data.
> @@ -7232,12 +7280,16 @@ kdump_thread_function_cyclic(void *arg) {
> page_data_buf[index].size = info->page_size;
> memcpy(page_data_buf[index].buf, buf, info->page_size);
> }
> -unlock:
> - pthread_mutex_unlock(&page_data_buf[index].mutex);
> + page_flag_buf->index = index;
> + buf_ready = TRUE;
> +next:
> + page_flag_buf->ready = 1;
> + page_flag_buf = page_flag_buf->next;
>
> }
> - }
>
> + pthread_mutex_unlock(&page_data_buf[index].mutex);
> + }
> retval = NULL;
>
> fail:
> @@ -7265,14 +7317,15 @@ write_kdump_pages_parallel_cyclic(struct cache_data *cd_header,
> struct page_desc pd;
> struct timeval tv_start;
> struct timeval last, new;
> - unsigned long long consuming_pfn;
> pthread_t **threads = NULL;
> struct thread_args *kdump_thread_args = NULL;
> void *thread_result;
> - int page_data_num;
> + int page_buf_num;
> struct page_data *page_data_buf = NULL;
> int i;
> int index;
> + int end_count, consuming, check_count;
> + mdf_pfn_t current_pfn, temp_pfn;
>
> if (info->flag_elf_dumpfile)
> return FALSE;
> @@ -7319,16 +7372,11 @@ write_kdump_pages_parallel_cyclic(struct cache_data *cd_header,
> threads = info->threads;
> kdump_thread_args = info->kdump_thread_args;
>
> - page_data_num = info->num_buffers;
> + page_buf_num = info->num_buffers;
> page_data_buf = info->page_data_buf;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < page_data_num; i++) {
> - /*
> - * producer will use pfn in page_data_buf to decide the
> - * consumed pfn
> - */
> - page_data_buf[i].pfn = start_pfn - 1;
> - page_data_buf[i].ready = 0;
> + for (i = 0; i < page_buf_num; i++) {
> + page_data_buf[i].used = 0;
> res = pthread_mutex_init(&page_data_buf[i].mutex, NULL);
> if (res != 0) {
> ERRMSG("Can't initialize mutex of page_data_buf. %s\n",
> @@ -7342,8 +7390,9 @@ write_kdump_pages_parallel_cyclic(struct cache_data *cd_header,
> kdump_thread_args[i].len_buf_out = len_buf_out;
> kdump_thread_args[i].start_pfn = start_pfn;
> kdump_thread_args[i].end_pfn = end_pfn;
> - kdump_thread_args[i].page_data_num = page_data_num;
> + kdump_thread_args[i].page_buf_num = page_buf_num;
> kdump_thread_args[i].page_data_buf = page_data_buf;
> + kdump_thread_args[i].page_flag_buf = info->page_flag_buf[i];
> kdump_thread_args[i].cycle = cycle;
>
> res = pthread_create(threads[i], NULL,
> @@ -7356,55 +7405,101 @@ write_kdump_pages_parallel_cyclic(struct cache_data *cd_header,
> }
> }
>
> - consuming_pfn = start_pfn;
> - index = -1;
> + while (1) {
> + consuming = 0;
> + check_count = 0;
>
> - gettimeofday(&last, NULL);
> + /*
> + * The basic idea is producer producing page and consumer writing page.
> + * Each producer have a page_flag_buf list which is used for storing page's description.
> + * The size of page_flag_buf is little so it won't take too much memory.
> + * And all producers will share a page_data_buf array which is used for storing page's compressed data.
> + * The main thread is the consumer. It will find the next pfn and write it into file.
> + * The next pfn is smallest pfn in all page_flag_buf.
> + */
> + /*
> + *
> + */
> + while (1) {
> + current_pfn = end_pfn;
> + end_count = 0;
>
> - while (consuming_pfn < end_pfn) {
> - index = consuming_pfn % page_data_num;
> + /*
> + * page_flag_buf is in circular linked list.
> + * The array info->page_flag_buf[] records the current page_flag_buf in each thread's
> + * page_flag_buf list.
> + * consuming is used for recording in which thread the pfn is the smallest.
> + * current_pfn is used for recording the value of pfn when checking the pfn.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < info->num_threads; i++) {
>
> - gettimeofday(&new, NULL);
> - if (new.tv_sec - last.tv_sec > WAIT_TIME) {
> - ERRMSG("Can't get data of pfn %llx.\n", consuming_pfn);
> - goto out;
> - }
> + /*
> + * ready == 0 means the page_flag_buf haven't been used.
> + * So we will skip it.
> + */
> + if (info->page_flag_buf[i]->ready == 0)
> + continue;
> + temp_pfn = info->page_flag_buf[i]->pfn;
>
> - /*
> - * check pfn first without mutex locked to reduce the time
> - * trying to lock the mutex
> - */
> - if (page_data_buf[index].pfn != consuming_pfn)
> - continue;
> + /*
> + * count how many threads have reached the end.
> + */
> + if (temp_pfn >= end_pfn) {
> + end_count++;
> + continue;
> + }
>
> - if (pthread_mutex_trylock(&page_data_buf[index].mutex) != 0)
> - continue;
> + if (current_pfn < temp_pfn)
> + continue;
>
> - /* check whether the found one is ready to be consumed */
> - if (page_data_buf[index].pfn != consuming_pfn ||
> - page_data_buf[index].ready != 1) {
> - goto unlock;
> + check_count++;
> + consuming = i;
> + current_pfn = temp_pfn;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * If all the threads have reached the end, we will finish writing.
> + */
> + if (end_count >= info->num_threads)
> + goto finish;
> +
> + /*
> + * Since it has the probabilty that there is no page_flag_buf being ready,
> + * we should recheck if it happens.
> + */
> + if (check_count == 0)
> + continue;
> +
> + /*
> + * When we check the pfn in page_flag_buf, it may be being produced.
> + * So we should wait until it is ready to use. And if the pfn is
> + * different from the value when we check, we should rechoose the buf.
> + */
> + gettimeofday(&last, NULL);
> + while (info->page_flag_buf[consuming]->ready != 1) {
> + gettimeofday(&new, NULL);
> + if (new.tv_sec - last.tv_sec > WAIT_TIME) {
> + ERRMSG("Can't get data of pfn.\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (current_pfn == info->page_flag_buf[consuming]->pfn)
> + break;
> }
>
> if ((num_dumped % per) == 0)
> print_progress(PROGRESS_COPY, num_dumped, info->num_dumpable);
>
> - /* next pfn is found, refresh last here */
> - last = new;
> - consuming_pfn++;
> - info->consumed_pfn++;
> - page_data_buf[index].ready = 0;
> -
> - if (page_data_buf[index].dumpable == FALSE)
> - goto unlock;
> -
> num_dumped++;
>
> - if (page_data_buf[index].zero == TRUE) {
> +
> + if (info->page_flag_buf[consuming]->zero == TRUE) {
> if (!write_cache(cd_header, pd_zero, sizeof(page_desc_t)))
> goto out;
> pfn_zero++;
> } else {
> + index = info->page_flag_buf[consuming]->index;
> pd.flags = page_data_buf[index].flags;
> pd.size = page_data_buf[index].size;
> pd.page_flags = 0;
> @@ -7420,12 +7515,12 @@ write_kdump_pages_parallel_cyclic(struct cache_data *cd_header,
> */
> if (!write_cache(cd_page, page_data_buf[index].buf, pd.size))
> goto out;
> -
> + page_data_buf[index].used = 0;
> }
> -unlock:
> - pthread_mutex_unlock(&page_data_buf[index].mutex);
> + info->page_flag_buf[consuming]->ready = 0;
> + info->page_flag_buf[consuming] = info->page_flag_buf[consuming]->next;
> }
> -
> +finish:
> ret = TRUE;
> /*
> * print [100 %]
> @@ -7464,7 +7559,7 @@ out:
> }
>
> if (page_data_buf != NULL) {
> - for (i = 0; i < page_data_num; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < page_buf_num; i++) {
> pthread_mutex_destroy(&page_data_buf[i].mutex);
> }
> }
> @@ -7564,6 +7659,7 @@ write_kdump_pages_cyclic(struct cache_data *cd_header, struct cache_data *cd_pag
> num_dumped++;
> if (!read_pfn(pfn, buf))
> goto out;
> +
> filter_data_buffer(buf, pfn_to_paddr(pfn), info->page_size);
>
> /*
> diff --git a/makedumpfile.h b/makedumpfile.h
> index e0b5bbf..7452e24 100644
> --- a/makedumpfile.h
> +++ b/makedumpfile.h
> @@ -977,7 +977,7 @@ typedef unsigned long long int ulonglong;
> #define PAGE_DATA_NUM (50)
> #define WAIT_TIME (60 * 10)
> #define PTHREAD_FAIL ((void *)-2)
> -#define NUM_BUFFERS (50)
> +#define NUM_BUFFERS (20)
>
> struct mmap_cache {
> char *mmap_buf;
> @@ -985,28 +985,31 @@ struct mmap_cache {
> off_t mmap_end_offset;
> };
>
> +struct page_flag {
> + mdf_pfn_t pfn;
> + char zero;
> + char ready;
> + short index;
> + struct page_flag *next;
> +};
> +
> struct page_data
> {
> - mdf_pfn_t pfn;
> - int dumpable;
> - int zero;
> - unsigned int flags;
> + pthread_mutex_t mutex;
> long size;
> unsigned char *buf;
> - pthread_mutex_t mutex;
> - /*
> - * whether the page_data is ready to be consumed
> - */
> - int ready;
> + int flags;
> + int used;
> };
>
> struct thread_args {
> int thread_num;
> unsigned long len_buf_out;
> mdf_pfn_t start_pfn, end_pfn;
> - int page_data_num;
> + int page_buf_num;
> struct cycle *cycle;
> struct page_data *page_data_buf;
> + struct page_flag *page_flag_buf;
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -1295,6 +1298,7 @@ struct DumpInfo {
> pthread_t **threads;
> struct thread_args *kdump_thread_args;
> struct page_data *page_data_buf;
> + struct page_flag **page_flag_buf;
> pthread_rwlock_t usemmap_rwlock;
> mdf_pfn_t current_pfn;
> pthread_mutex_t current_pfn_mutex;
>
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-18 5:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-18 2:00 [PATCH RFC] Improve the performance of --num-threads -d 31 Zhou Wenjian
2016-01-18 5:09 ` "Zhou, Wenjian/周文剑" [this message]
2016-01-22 4:53 ` Atsushi Kumagai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=569C7373.60504@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=zhouwj-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=ats-kumagai@wm.jp.nec.com \
--cc=cfan@redhat.com \
--cc=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.