From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] sdio: Prevent re-tuning conflicting with custom sleep
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 11:51:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <569E073C.7080204@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFrxM25QmbVEqnfRi+gjT6Jg_uAFXuO2xdCw6H2ST7EDZw@mail.gmail.com>
On 27/11/15 16:06, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 26 November 2015 at 13:58, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> wrote:
>> On 28/04/15 17:45, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>> Here are 2 patches that allow brcmfmac to awake from a
>>> custom sleep state that conflicts with re-tuning.
>>>
>>> The first patch adds sdio_retune_hold_now() and
>>> sdio_retune_release(). They are used in the 2nd patch
>>> to prevent re-tuning for the 'wake-up' command.
>>>
>>>
>>> Adrian Hunter (2):
>>> mmc: core: Add functions for SDIO to hold re-tuning
>>> brcmfmac: Prevent re-tuning conflicting with 'wake-up'
>>>
>>> drivers/mmc/core/host.c | 6 ++++++
>>> drivers/mmc/core/host.h | 1 +
>>> drivers/mmc/core/sdio_io.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>>> drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c | 6 ++++++
>>> include/linux/mmc/sdio_func.h | 3 +++
>>> 5 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> These patches still apply and are still needed.
>> Can they be applied?
>>
>
> I need to have yet another round of thinking about this, I will get
> back to as soon as I can.
I see drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c has moved but otherwise
these still apply. Any chance to look at this?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-19 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-28 14:45 [PATCH 0/2] sdio: Prevent re-tuning conflicting with custom sleep Adrian Hunter
2015-04-28 14:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] mmc: core: Add functions for SDIO to hold re-tuning Adrian Hunter
2015-04-28 14:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] brcmfmac: Prevent re-tuning conflicting with 'wake-up' Adrian Hunter
2015-11-26 12:58 ` [PATCH 0/2] sdio: Prevent re-tuning conflicting with custom sleep Adrian Hunter
2015-11-27 14:06 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-01-19 9:51 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=569E073C.7080204@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.