From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.2]:29924 "EHLO smtp2-g21.free.fr"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752399AbcASMPG (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 19 Jan 2016 07:15:06 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: tango: rename ARCH_TANGOX to ARCH_TANGO
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>
Cc: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
References: <569D421C.30504@free.fr> <569D4ACF.6020701@roeck-us.net>
 <569E10D8.2000509@free.fr>
From: Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr>
Message-ID: <569E28C4.7010403@free.fr>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 13:15:00 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <569E10D8.2000509@free.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org

Hello again,

While I'm at it, should I also rename TANGOX_WATCHDOG ?
Or should it be left as is, to minimize churn?

Regards.