From: Jennifer Herbert <Jennifer.Herbert@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 3/4] spinlock: shrink struct lock_debug
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 12:31:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <569E2C9D.2040901@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5674495102000078000C169A@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
On 18/12/15 16:58, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 18.12.15 at 15:09, <david.vrabel@citrix.com> wrote:
>> --- a/xen/common/spinlock.c
>> +++ b/xen/common/spinlock.c
>> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ static atomic_t spin_debug __read_mostly = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
>>
>> static void check_lock(struct lock_debug *debug)
>> {
>> - int irq_safe = !local_irq_is_enabled();
>> + s16 irq_safe = !local_irq_is_enabled();
>>
>> if ( unlikely(atomic_read(&spin_debug) <= 0) )
>> return;
> I can't figure out why this odd looking change is needed.
>
> Jan
>
This patch shrinks struct lock_debug's irq_safe member. Since you end
up with many instances of this embedded in other structures such as
struct domain, this become a useful saving in memory. At one point, I
had an issue with struct domain exceeding 4k, which caused trouble.
Given the change to struct_lock debug, this local variable irq_safe, is
compared with it, and used in cmpxchg with it it, and therefore should
match type.
- Jenny
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-19 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-18 14:09 [PATCHv1 0/4] spinlock: add qrwlocks David Vrabel
2015-12-18 14:09 ` [PATCHv1 1/4] atomic: replace atomic_compareandswap() with atomic_cmpxchg() David Vrabel
2015-12-18 17:01 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-21 15:19 ` Ian Campbell
2015-12-18 14:09 ` [PATCHv1 2/4] x86/domain: Compile with lock_profile=y enabled David Vrabel
2015-12-18 14:09 ` [PATCHv1 3/4] spinlock: shrink struct lock_debug David Vrabel
2015-12-18 16:58 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-19 12:31 ` Jennifer Herbert [this message]
2016-01-19 13:04 ` Jan Beulich
2015-12-18 14:09 ` [PATCHv1 4/4] spinlock: add fair read-write locks David Vrabel
2015-12-22 13:54 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-18 16:44 ` Jennifer Herbert
2015-12-18 15:47 ` [PATCHv1 0/4] spinlock: add qrwlocks Ian Campbell
2015-12-18 15:49 ` David Vrabel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=569E2C9D.2040901@citrix.com \
--to=jennifer.herbert@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.