From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:58446 "EHLO
	bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750857AbcASNIS (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 19 Jan 2016 08:08:18 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: tango: rename ARCH_TANGOX to ARCH_TANGO
To: =?UTF-8?B?TcOlbnMgUnVsbGfDpXJk?= <mans@mansr.com>,
	Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr>
References: <569D421C.30504@free.fr> <569D4ACF.6020701@roeck-us.net>
 <569E10D8.2000509@free.fr> <569E28C4.7010403@free.fr>
 <yw1x7fj5sq50.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Message-ID: <569E3541.20307@roeck-us.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 05:08:17 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <yw1x7fj5sq50.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org

On 01/19/2016 04:35 AM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr> writes:
>
>> Hello again,
>>
>> While I'm at it, should I also rename TANGOX_WATCHDOG ?
>> Or should it be left as is, to minimize churn?
>
> I don't really care either way.
>
Me not either.

Guenter