From: "arnaud.mouiche@invoxia.com" <arnaud.mouiche@invoxia.com>
To: linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Subject: Overlayfs with NFS lower layer is still not working
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 16:09:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <569E51AB.2040001@invoxia.com> (raw)
Hi,
I'm following the progress done for supporting NFS as lower layer.
It is still not working since ENXIO is returned on every attempt to open
a file (linux 4.4 + overlayfs-next branch)
here is a simple example:
mkdir /tmp/nfs
mount -t nfs x.x.x.x:/export/foo -o nolock /tmp/nfs
mkdir -p /tmp/nv/overlay.wd
mkdir -p /tmp/nv/upper
mkdir /tmp/ovl
mount -t overlay overlay
-olowerdir=/tmp/nfs,upperdir=/tmp/nv/upper,workdir=/tmp/nv/overlay.wd
/tmp/ovl
# up to this point every thing is fine. "ls" is working. yet
cat /tmp/ovl/some_file_exisiting on /tmp/nfs
cat: can't open '/tmp/ovl/some_file_exisiting': No such device or address
I dig and I just found that it fails because every inode created by
ovl_lookup() are keeping the initial no_open() (fs/inode.c) method as
inode->i_fops->open,
[<800d38f4>] (inode_init_always) from [<800d4204>] (alloc_inode+0x48/0x98)
[<800d4204>] (alloc_inode) from [<800d5fac>] (new_inode_pseudo+0x8/0x64)
[<800d5fac>] (new_inode_pseudo) from [<800d6014>] (new_inode+0xc/0x20)
[<800d6014>] (new_inode) from [<80179688>] (ovl_new_inode+0x10/0xe0)
[<80179688>] (ovl_new_inode) from [<80178ae8>] (ovl_lookup+0x1d0/0x44c)
[<80178ae8>] (ovl_lookup) from [<800c5f00>] (lookup_real+0x30/0x4c)
[<800c5f00>] (lookup_real) from [<800c9030>] (lookup_open+0xd8/0x184)
[<800c9030>] (lookup_open) from [<800c9284>] (do_last+0x1a8/0x6e8)
[<800c9284>] (do_last) from [<800c9858>] (path_openat+0x94/0x134)
[<800c9858>] (path_openat) from [<800caec8>] (do_filp_open+0x38/0x84)
[<800caec8>] (do_filp_open) from [<800bd604>] (do_sys_open+0x124/0x1c4)
[<800bd604>] (do_sys_open) from [<8000ed20>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x3c)
When the layer is not a remote one (eg. ramfs), d_select_inode() is
called before the open() call, giving a change to change i_fops content
with the real ones.
But in NFS case, the i_fops switch done during d_select_inode() is not
done, and vfs_open() will finally call no_open() returning ENXIO.
Just trying to also add a "d_select_inode" phase in
"ovl_reval_dentry_operations" fix this... but the system crash later
when the file is closed.
Just to tell that there is still something missing...
Unfortunately, I'm definitely not familiar at all with VFS & co to
understand exactly what is missing ;)
Regards,
Arnaud
reply other threads:[~2016-01-19 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=569E51AB.2040001@invoxia.com \
--to=arnaud.mouiche@invoxia.com \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.