From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from madras.collabora.co.uk (madras.collabora.co.uk [46.235.227.172])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 899C320F6
	for <regressions@lists.linux.dev>; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 14:08:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.137] (unknown [213.194.153.37])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: rcn)
	by madras.collabora.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6AAB8660321F;
	Fri, 14 Apr 2023 15:08:28 +0100 (BST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com;
	s=mail; t=1681481309;
	bh=I+aHzA+Q4ne4xfBmJkGe2Y0X33bIvFmF69y9bnWuVcQ=;
	h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From;
	b=Fi2ZjYIAcu7jqxL95ctMMCV4n/D+ocJfsLyTMmwc/3arbxRYiga0wltghFMnIjanD
	 6zh2URKn/GWRn5DdqXtXGg9RkQX3hC3l2HUFOg4pstgQCjmwkyswc8E/zdyjdTUkWP
	 QY74JSdTyMG2ihTL02ADdN5+R2A9FQ1DJy9Y8F5dYqNnwk5QGXADF2xQmZ1ierLhW3
	 oUPhnSIvT3kDYJFis5yeBa/rIaJaZLsm/IZut1esgQHaLBeEVqQrH02TB8Tj9XSUyq
	 dxTTbptKkKtd6nSuXQ+u7BUKyHv+byhvzxdbF7vpzdqgaXbi38lHr0gmKWGWly6SRH
	 cTKaxd/HzRlTQ==
Message-ID: <569c0f2f-ff7b-9367-e33e-ddf37a13232b@collabora.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 16:08:25 +0200
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: regressions@lists.linux.dev
List-Id: <regressions.lists.linux.dev>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:regressions+subscribe@lists.linux.dev>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:regressions+unsubscribe@lists.linux.dev>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.8.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bgmac: fix *initial* chip reset to support BCM5358
Content-Language: en-US
To: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
 Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>, =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?=
 <rafal@milecki.pl>, =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
 netdev@vger.kernel.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
 Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>
References: <20230227091156.19509-1-zajec5@gmail.com>
 <20230404134613.wtikjp6v63isofoc@rcn-XPS-13-9305>
 <002c1f96-b82f-6be7-2530-68c5ae1d962d@milecki.pl>
 <b7b11a57-9512-cda9-1b15-5dd5aa12f162@gmail.com>
 <d6990d00-6fd5-cd89-755d-d7f566c574fa@leemhuis.info>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Ricardo_Ca=c3=b1uelo?= <ricardo.canuelo@collabora.com>
In-Reply-To: <d6990d00-6fd5-cd89-755d-d7f566c574fa@leemhuis.info>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi Thorsten,

On 14/4/23 16:04, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> What happened to this? It seems there wasn't any progress since above
> mail week. But well, seems to be a odd issue anyway (is that one of
> those issues that CI systems find, but don't cause practical issues in
> the field?). Hence: can somebody with more knowledge about this please
> tell if it this is something I can likely drop from the list of tacked
> regressions?

 From Rafał's answer, I think we can consider this a false positive and move on.

Cheers,
Ricardo