From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mailout2.w1.samsung.com (mailout2.w1.samsung.com. [210.118.77.12]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id tn7si531134pac.1.2016.01.20.16.34.31 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Jan 2016 16:34:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from eucpsbgm2.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.245]) by mailout2.w1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.31.0 64bit (built May 5 2014)) with ESMTP id <0O1A00KJB1LEVY70@mailout2.w1.samsung.com> for rtc-linux@googlegroups.com; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 00:34:26 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH 0/8] rtc: max77686: Extend driver and add max77802 support To: Alexandre Belloni , Javier Martinez Canillas References: <1453310088-29985-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> <20160121003047.GF3367@piout.net> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Chanwoo Choi , Laxman Dewangan , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Message-id: <56A02791.9010409@samsung.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 09:34:25 +0900 MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <20160121003047.GF3367@piout.net> Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , On 21.01.2016 09:30, Alexandre Belloni wrote: >> I believe all patches should go through the RTC tree with proper acks or >> wait until the RTC patches land to pick the defconfig changes. >> > > I think Olof would prefer the last patches to go through arm-soc. That would be preferred but merging them before the 5/8 would cause a loss of functionality on these defconfigs making it non-bisectable approach. I think it would be good to preserve bisectability in that matter so either: 1. a tag from RTC on top of which these patches would be applied in arm-soc, 2. take them to RTC tree with our acks. Best regards, Krzysztof -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux". Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux . Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist before submitting a driver. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] rtc: max77686: Extend driver and add max77802 support Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 09:34:25 +0900 Message-ID: <56A02791.9010409@samsung.com> References: <1453310088-29985-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> <20160121003047.GF3367@piout.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <20160121003047.GF3367@piout.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Alexandre Belloni , Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Chanwoo Choi , Laxman Dewangan , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org On 21.01.2016 09:30, Alexandre Belloni wrote: >> I believe all patches should go through the RTC tree with proper acks or >> wait until the RTC patches land to pick the defconfig changes. >> > > I think Olof would prefer the last patches to go through arm-soc. That would be preferred but merging them before the 5/8 would cause a loss of functionality on these defconfigs making it non-bisectable approach. I think it would be good to preserve bisectability in that matter so either: 1. a tag from RTC on top of which these patches would be applied in arm-soc, 2. take them to RTC tree with our acks. Best regards, Krzysztof From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: k.kozlowski@samsung.com (Krzysztof Kozlowski) Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 09:34:25 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 0/8] rtc: max77686: Extend driver and add max77802 support In-Reply-To: <20160121003047.GF3367@piout.net> References: <1453310088-29985-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> <20160121003047.GF3367@piout.net> Message-ID: <56A02791.9010409@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 21.01.2016 09:30, Alexandre Belloni wrote: >> I believe all patches should go through the RTC tree with proper acks or >> wait until the RTC patches land to pick the defconfig changes. >> > > I think Olof would prefer the last patches to go through arm-soc. That would be preferred but merging them before the 5/8 would cause a loss of functionality on these defconfigs making it non-bisectable approach. I think it would be good to preserve bisectability in that matter so either: 1. a tag from RTC on top of which these patches would be applied in arm-soc, 2. take them to RTC tree with our acks. Best regards, Krzysztof