[Ocfs2-devel] ocfs2: o2hb: not fence self if storage down

[Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>]

Hi Junxiao,
So you mean the negotiation you added only happens if all nodes storage
link down?

Thanks,
Joseph

On 2016/1/20 21:27, Junxiao Bi wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
> 
>> ? 2016?1?20????5:18?Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> ???
>>
>> Hi Junxiao,
>> Thanks for the patch set.
>> In case only one node storage link down, if this node doesn't fence
>> self, other nodes will still check and mark this node dead, which will
>> cause cluster membership inconsistency.
>> In your patch set, I cannot see any logic to handle this. Am I missing
>> something?
> No, there is no logic for this. But why didn?t node fence self when storage down? What make a softirq timer can?t be run, another bug?
> 
> Thanks,
> Junxiao.
>>
>> On 2016/1/20 11:13, Junxiao Bi wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This serial of patches is to fix the issue that when storage down,
>>> all nodes will fence self due to write timeout.
>>> With this patch set, all nodes will keep going until storage back
>>> online, except if the following issue happens, then all nodes will
>>> do as before to fence self.
>>> 1. io error got
>>> 2. network between nodes down
>>> 3. nodes panic
>>>
>>> Junxiao Bi (6):
>>>      ocfs2: o2hb: add negotiate timer
>>>      ocfs2: o2hb: add NEGO_TIMEOUT message
>>>      ocfs2: o2hb: add NEGOTIATE_APPROVE message
>>>      ocfs2: o2hb: add some user/debug log
>>>      ocfs2: o2hb: don't negotiate if last hb fail
>>>      ocfs2: o2hb: fix hb hung time
>>>
>>> fs/ocfs2/cluster/heartbeat.c |  181 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 175 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Junxiao.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ocfs2-devel mailing list
>>> Ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com
>>> https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> .
>