From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143] helo=radon.swed.at) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1aMBYY-0005nI-Gc for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 09:29:31 +0000 Subject: Re: Block device emulation on top of ubi volumes with read/write support To: Charles Godson References: <56A00CB2.3050505@nod.at> <56A02274.3010705@nod.at> <56A024A1.3020201@nod.at> <56A027BF.8000804@nod.at> Cc: Daniel Ehrenberg , Ezequiel Garcia , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , Thomas Petazzoni , Willy Tarreau From: Richard Weinberger Message-ID: <56A0A4DF.3020504@nod.at> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 10:29:03 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Am 21.01.2016 um 01:51 schrieb Charles Godson: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> >> What is your fear? >> If your NAND is loosing random blocks you are in trouble anyways. >> >> Thanks, >> //richard > More along the lines of having software blow away first 2K (or > similar) of my mtd partition (sw bug). I think I would lose everything > in that case, right? When I have multiple mtd partitions, I would lose > only one of my file systems. However, all of this probably comes down > to having backup images, if high availability and reliability is > required. If your software kills random blocks you're better with multiple partitions due to backups...But as the kernel is software too... ;) Strictly speaking you'd not lose everything after say 2k are gone. But have to recover the data manually. :) Thanks, //richard