From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [RFC] VirtFS support on Xen Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 10:50:08 +0000 Message-ID: <56A0B7E0.20606@citrix.com> References: <20160121102844.GP1691@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aMCof-00037U-JC for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 10:50:13 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20160121102844.GP1691@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Wei Liu , Xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 21/01/16 10:28, Wei Liu wrote: > [RFC] VirtFS support on Xen > > # Introduction > > QEMU/KVM supports file system passthrough via an interface called > VirtFS [0]. VirtFS is in turn implemented with 9pfs protocol [1] and > VirtIO transport. > > Xen used to have its own implementation of file system passthrough > called XenFS, but that has been inactive for a few years. The latest > update was in 2009 [2]. > > This project aims to add VirtFS support on Xen. This is more > sustainable than inventing our own wheel.# What's the use case for this? Who wants this feature? David