From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759461AbcAUMUg (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2016 07:20:36 -0500 Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:41778 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758886AbcAUMUd (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2016 07:20:33 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/35] 3.10.95-stable review To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20160120211951.234493363@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah.kh@samsung.com, info@kernelci.org, stable@vger.kernel.org From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: <56A0CD0E.4010103@roeck-us.net> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 04:20:30 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160120211951.234493363@linuxfoundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated_sender: linux@roeck-us.net X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bh-25.webhostbox.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roeck-us.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: bh-25.webhostbox.net: authenticated_id: linux@roeck-us.net X-Authenticated-Sender: bh-25.webhostbox.net: linux@roeck-us.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/20/2016 02:00 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.95 release. > There are 35 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri Jan 22 21:19:15 UTC 2016. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 122 pass: 122 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 72 pass: 72 fail: 0 Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders. Thanks, Guenter