From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752441AbcAUUIn (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:08:43 -0500 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:47371 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751122AbcAUUIl (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:08:41 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,327,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="638015491" Subject: Re: Linux patch disabling AVX when eagerfpu is turned off - possibly not required To: Leonid Shatz , "'Ingo Molnar'" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "'Yu-cheng Yu'" , "'Andy Lutomirski'" , "'Borislav Petkov'" , "'Fenghua Yu'" , "'H. Peter Anvin'" , "'Linus Torvalds'" , "'Oleg Nesterov'" , "'Peter Zijlstra'" , "'Quentin Casasnovas'" , "'Ravi V. Shankar'" , "'Sai Praneeth Prakhya'" , "'Thomas Gleixner'" References: <02fd01d15437$233056c0$69910440$@ravellosystems.com> Cc: liran.alon@ravellosystems.com, mendel.aizner@ravellosystems.com, "'Elazar Leibovich'" , "'Eyal Moscovici'" , gil.hoffer@ravellosystems.com From: Dave Hansen Message-ID: <56A13AC7.2040601@intel.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 12:08:39 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <02fd01d15437$233056c0$69910440$@ravellosystems.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/21/2016 02:33 AM, Leonid Shatz wrote: > In view of above findings we would like to suggest to double check if > disabling AVX together with "eagerfpu off" is actually required and is a > real necessity. It would be helpful to consult with Intel engineers > regarding related design details. Hi Leonid, Thanks for the report! Are you aware of any actual eagerfpu=off use in practice, or is this mostly a theoretical concern?