From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc patch v4.4-rt2] sched: fix up preempt lazy forward port
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 15:14:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A2395D.3090106@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56A22FE7.6070005@ti.com>
On 01/22/2016 02:34 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> Do you still see it with the missing lazy bits? I don't see where this
>> could come from.
>>
>
> yep. I've tried it with and without changing _TIF_WORK_MASK
> Seems It's triggered by Virtual terminal keyboard_tasklet
Just bootet my current v4.4 to cross check what you see and I have this:
[ 3.808273] clocksource: Switched to clocksource arch_sys_counter
[ 3.851193] keyboard: kbd_init(1609)
[ 3.861903] keyboard: kbd_bh(1201)
[ 3.868322] keyboard: kbd_init(1612)
[ 3.868581] NET: Registered protocol family 2
So. No backtrace here. According to the full dmesg I should have all
CPUs up by now. kbd_bh is comming from ksoftirqd as well. No idea why
you see this.
There is a irq off region which sets and removes RUN bit, I have no
idea why you have this backtrace.
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-22 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-18 9:08 [rfc patch v4.4-rt2] sched: fix up preempt lazy forward port Mike Galbraith
2016-01-18 20:18 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-01-19 2:29 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-01-19 2:29 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-01-21 12:54 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-01-22 12:24 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-01-22 12:24 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-01-22 13:19 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-01-22 13:34 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-01-22 14:14 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2016-01-22 15:04 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-01-22 18:21 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-02-21 15:11 ` [patch] sched,rt: __always_inline preemptible_lazy() Mike Galbraith
2016-01-19 4:41 ` [rfc patch v4.4-rt2] sched: fix up preempt lazy forward port Mike Galbraith
2016-01-19 4:41 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-01-19 5:14 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-01-19 5:14 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-01-22 11:58 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-01-22 11:58 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-01-22 12:54 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-01-22 12:54 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-01-22 20:40 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-01-25 17:14 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-02-01 13:04 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56A2395D.3090106@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.