From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] watchdog: tango: rename ARCH_TANGOX to ARCH_TANGO To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Mans Rullgard , Wim Van Sebroeck , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org References: <56A0EABB.3090901@free.fr> <20160121204255.GA10214@roeck-us.net> <56A239D4.5050708@roeck-us.net> From: Mason Message-ID: <56A241ED.1000201@free.fr> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 15:51:25 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56A239D4.5050708@roeck-us.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-ID: On 22/01/2016 15:16, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 01/22/2016 03:14 AM, Måns Rullgård wrote: > >> Guenter Roeck writes: >> >>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 03:27:07PM +0100, Mason wrote: >>>> From: Marc Gonzalez >>>> >>>> This change was requested by arm-soc maintainer Kevin Hilman >>>> because the X in TANGOX is a wildcard. >>> >>> Not what I was looking for, but not worth arguing about it, so >> >> It would be better if the commit message simply mentioned the fact that >> the platform support uses ARCH_TANGO and this has to match. The details >> of why it got named that way are less important. >> > Agreed. That is why I had asked to move that information after the "---". > But as I said, this is not worth an endless argument. As long as the patch makes it into v4.5, I don't mind a different commit message. You can reword as you wish. Regards.