From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:50636 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753208AbcAVPlP (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2016 10:41:15 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] watchdog: tango: rename ARCH_TANGOX to ARCH_TANGO To: Mason References: <56A0EABB.3090901@free.fr> <20160121204255.GA10214@roeck-us.net> <56A239D4.5050708@roeck-us.net> <56A241ED.1000201@free.fr> Cc: Mans Rullgard , Wim Van Sebroeck , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: <56A24D98.8080407@roeck-us.net> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 07:41:12 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56A241ED.1000201@free.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org On 01/22/2016 06:51 AM, Mason wrote: > On 22/01/2016 15:16, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >> On 01/22/2016 03:14 AM, Måns Rullgård wrote: >> >>> Guenter Roeck writes: >>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 03:27:07PM +0100, Mason wrote: >>>>> From: Marc Gonzalez >>>>> >>>>> This change was requested by arm-soc maintainer Kevin Hilman >>>>> because the X in TANGOX is a wildcard. >>>> >>>> Not what I was looking for, but not worth arguing about it, so >>> >>> It would be better if the commit message simply mentioned the fact that >>> the platform support uses ARCH_TANGO and this has to match. The details >>> of why it got named that way are less important. >>> >> Agreed. That is why I had asked to move that information after the "---". >> But as I said, this is not worth an endless argument. > > As long as the patch makes it into v4.5, I don't mind a different > commit message. You can reword as you wish. > Wim is the maintainer. If anything, he would have to do the rewording. I would like you to keep one thing in mind, though, for your future patches. Maintainers tend to be busy. It helps to make life easy for them. Thanks, Guenter