From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id C3161E00948; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 17:09:48 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.192.45 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-qg0-f45.google.com (mail-qg0-f45.google.com [209.85.192.45]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6B0E007F2 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 17:09:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id e32so71274623qgf.3 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 17:09:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cardoe-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=BX9MswNIZ6tdZqDclL8oIExzpCi382JpL/fS7xyuzkI=; b=eYw3A5Iwe8L8/1vqIElrTXJHB38P7LvViOwxXnL5ZpFcrfNKdKf6uhULMDaosqxBek AXxX5qG6/28tsefccVYzcgTh8oVabCyFvF1rVy5SJtp3F/rfc9E2intQnyDsz05sP5DE L/ekZweBxPFWW4D6IvTicoawC+LUNSPgCvZfqLk33H4IWmz+uogLoleqxDDoBgf9rL+r uvMY6FCHFwk+1C7T/A9E5cHv74NAdQ+r56I4BATJDzka2w2Qp36QHlXRzVut02uTVy06 NlYRl4GWMgnGBEIfDstsusEr1jFDYCKzJgmACKe/WjmCSGMRyURZ8wLMRRY3Cy137+du e1zA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=BX9MswNIZ6tdZqDclL8oIExzpCi382JpL/fS7xyuzkI=; b=atyEiPXRh5TaeSGq7shidLt6CSXYYWY/0XMLd2thSMsI+gW2ek5x+cnOVsnYVijYZL jWjSf30rTrBgqNvhibdPDeDgcwoATxPFrGMVdHyK/uKp93L3glWh3ZYTXRZ8d1aw6kAU iguEdRdo2WtvN+bAo/99bLvGOz/D78VMu+7FWWnAnYg6IZEPe9U8yKBu4mzAb1DUcamK X2mW9jbiywq1P/e8KibKWh7eobgclDGv8xuNOunqtAGhM+mpYiLCRrR0mkkvswxJdzUB mip8u9FSi690aUXuH+k+V/H29qKR9u9eEF+pTAYGEjAQtlkTI4REJpgRR/AlSaZBqT0F RZUg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTcq9Rgekf9GBgXF1DBOF2ekUelSrxgviKTqghfHHXPmeekldI0WSzJ4dalCWJCtQ== X-Received: by 10.140.101.119 with SMTP id t110mr7556430qge.68.1453511382375; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 17:09:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from doug-macbook.local ([2601:7c0:c300:dad6:11f4:8bdf:525d:a055]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 31sm3933475qgz.8.2016.01.22.17.09.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 22 Jan 2016 17:09:40 -0800 (PST) To: Chris Patterson , "McGillion, Brian" References: From: Doug Goldstein Message-ID: <56A2D2D0.7060900@cardoe.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 19:09:36 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: "meta-virtualization@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Failure to build xen-image-minimal X-BeenThere: meta-virtualization@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of layer enabling hypervisor, virtualization tool stack, and cloud support" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 01:09:48 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 1701 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ANesMXB9ITO8teV8LKMDN9eaf0lMRXRCO" --ANesMXB9ITO8teV8LKMDN9eaf0lMRXRCO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 1/21/16 10:05 AM, Chris Patterson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:05 AM, McGillion, Brian > wrote: >> Hi Chris, >> >> Thank you, that was it! >> >> In general should that config not be part of the xen-minimal-image rec= ipe? >> >=20 > The DISTRO_FEATURES is more of a "global" variable and the scope of > xen-minimal-image is not sufficient to get what you need (in this > case, affect linux-yocto). >=20 > Perhaps we should document in the README? >=20 I was thinking we can do something like... do_check_xen_state() { if [ "${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'xen', ' yes', 'no', d)}" =3D "no" ]; then die "DISTRO_FEATURES does not contain 'xen'" fi } addtask check_xen_state before do_rootfs I can submit a patch. --=20 Doug Goldstein --ANesMXB9ITO8teV8LKMDN9eaf0lMRXRCO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWotLTXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRBNTM5MEQ2RTNFMTkyNzlCNzVDMzIwOTVB MkJDMDNEQzg3RUQxQkQ0AAoJEKK8A9yH7RvUZXoP/0tW4WxaSg6gFwgf1x4PbcQ9 MAmidILBqQn/zH9SiLq9BaE3Ig1IsUZdhs+96Un5qZpBGjxZ/1+HfYS+GIVYBPKK 2VWREkKAT8FQspqNN0U0PeOINQv65ksxUPKTKLjnF169b4Ws3u3QelU9tzpzpiF6 fUNtQqEfNifaTTTEtSTgAHKeRap6FPegFece9VcOJs9L/Y8o7T0rdR22wOmFh1ku 2ogo+A+176JJPvjZzSgvsLVILhoOrpabFoVQ473QDrbJ54u8BEabZ+mcxoQZFlWQ JRDwECWaZ5wPAWa1KvwSAjCQKw9lmbObvvwum5ebGQMFIqAPqdCdRr6Vm2MBZdDk maKprKDqpgu1z2nozfMFq409Jy72kRC7hemXP6K7maAM2wi2xWNKXTjJQhiDH9nG CKg99H6wGnPavCNmQmNkrWSTK+gAyNRHRECo0KofD4ijkkDvLXYi56QTkGnmcfP7 n9IkOWf73stNOj0AHDaZx1eNdyTdSqG1gt9+G47jbDEXVF/2ST+pjkiuEXrU1dwU jqsfQBiM0fp+HJlyLwDbIyOjtt0I4UP5uDQI7j8f5nT+nPX8gNnJcZWACLSSdTix zHSXIcPUFHsXhbhvpkOUeiHwBKOiqkhFx14GNKD6AZMQRBg7pfiX7xeRwX0qZ0SV pBXOfFjOnisS6TPdOHr/ =t5gz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ANesMXB9ITO8teV8LKMDN9eaf0lMRXRCO--