From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] net: walk through filters reversely if traffic is outgress
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:58:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A5AB83.10800@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453450307-16982-1-git-send-email-lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
On 01/22/2016 04:11 PM, Li Zhijian wrote:
> Previously, if the netdev has more than one filters, the ingress
> or outgress traffic pass the filter in the same order. this patch
> is to make the outgress pass the filter in a reverse order
Need a description why we need this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> include/net/net.h | 4 +++-
> net/filter.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
> net/net.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/net.h b/include/net/net.h
> index 7af3e15..1d807cc 100644
> --- a/include/net/net.h
> +++ b/include/net/net.h
> @@ -79,6 +79,8 @@ typedef struct NetClientInfo {
> SetVnetBE *set_vnet_be;
> } NetClientInfo;
>
> +QTAILQ_HEAD(NetFilterHead, NetFilterState);
> +
> struct NetClientState {
> NetClientInfo *info;
> int link_down;
> @@ -92,7 +94,7 @@ struct NetClientState {
> NetClientDestructor *destructor;
> unsigned int queue_index;
> unsigned rxfilter_notify_enabled:1;
> - QTAILQ_HEAD(, NetFilterState) filters;
> + struct NetFilterHead filters;
> };
>
> typedef struct NICState {
> diff --git a/net/filter.c b/net/filter.c
> index 5d90f83..17a8398 100644
> --- a/net/filter.c
> +++ b/net/filter.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,22 @@ ssize_t qemu_netfilter_receive(NetFilterState *nf,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static NetFilterState *netfilter_next(NetFilterState *nf,
> + NetFilterDirection dir)
> +{
> + NetFilterState *next;
> +
> + if (dir == NET_FILTER_DIRECTION_TX) {
> + /* forward walk through filters */
> + next = QTAILQ_NEXT(nf, next);
> + } else {
> + /* reverse order */
> + next = QTAILQ_PREV(nf, NetFilterHead, next);
> + }
> +
> + return next;
> +}
> +
> ssize_t qemu_netfilter_pass_to_next(NetClientState *sender,
> unsigned flags,
> const struct iovec *iov,
> @@ -43,7 +59,7 @@ ssize_t qemu_netfilter_pass_to_next(NetClientState *sender,
> int ret = 0;
> int direction;
> NetFilterState *nf = opaque;
> - NetFilterState *next = QTAILQ_NEXT(nf, next);
> + NetFilterState *next = NULL;
>
> if (!sender || !sender->peer) {
> /* no receiver, or sender been deleted, no need to pass it further */
> @@ -61,6 +77,7 @@ ssize_t qemu_netfilter_pass_to_next(NetClientState *sender,
> direction = nf->direction;
> }
>
> + next = netfilter_next(nf, direction);
> while (next) {
> /*
> * if qemu_netfilter_pass_to_next been called, means that
> @@ -73,7 +90,7 @@ ssize_t qemu_netfilter_pass_to_next(NetClientState *sender,
> if (ret) {
> return ret;
> }
> - next = QTAILQ_NEXT(next, next);
> + next = netfilter_next(next, direction);
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/net/net.c b/net/net.c
> index 87dd356..05ec996 100644
> --- a/net/net.c
> +++ b/net/net.c
> @@ -580,11 +580,24 @@ static ssize_t filter_receive_iov(NetClientState *nc,
> ssize_t ret = 0;
> NetFilterState *nf = NULL;
>
> - QTAILQ_FOREACH(nf, &nc->filters, next) {
> - ret = qemu_netfilter_receive(nf, direction, sender, flags, iov,
> - iovcnt, sent_cb);
> - if (ret) {
> - return ret;
> + assert(direction == NET_FILTER_DIRECTION_TX ||
> + direction == NET_FILTER_DIRECTION_RX);
> +
Don't get why we need this assert.
Other looks good.
> + if (direction == NET_FILTER_DIRECTION_TX) {
> + QTAILQ_FOREACH(nf, &nc->filters, next) {
> + ret = qemu_netfilter_receive(nf, direction, sender, flags, iov,
> + iovcnt, sent_cb);
> + if (ret) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> + } else {
> + QTAILQ_FOREACH_REVERSE(nf, &nc->filters, NetFilterHead, next) {
> + ret = qemu_netfilter_receive(nf, direction, sender, flags, iov,
> + iovcnt, sent_cb);
> + if (ret) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> }
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-25 4:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-22 8:11 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] net: walk through filters reversely if traffic is outgress Li Zhijian
2016-01-25 4:58 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2016-01-25 6:27 ` Li Zhijian
2016-01-26 3:08 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56A5AB83.10800@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.