From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?UTF-8?B?0J3QuNC60LjRhNC+0YDQvtCyINCg0YPRgdC70LDQvQ==?=
	<nikiforovr@ideco.ru>
Subject: LVM thin provisioning actual status
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 18:45:23 +0500
Message-ID: <56A626F3.7070606@ideco.ru>
Reply-To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/options/dm-devel>,
	<mailto:dm-devel-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:dm-devel@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:dm-devel-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel>,
	<mailto:dm-devel-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com
To: dm-devel@redhat.com
List-Id: dm-devel.ids

Hello there,

I would like to know actual status of LVM thin provisioning.
I can see warning about experimental status in documentation 
(https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/device-mapper/thin-provisioning.txt) 

and what i'm trying to understand now is what problems i may face using 
thin provisioning.
Are there any stability or data corruption problems?
Is it stable and reliable nowadays?
May be its unstable in some specific situations?

Thanks.