From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: maninder1.s@samsung.com, Vaneet Narang <v.narang@samsung.com>
Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"willemb@google.com" <willemb@google.com>,
"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
"eyal.birger@gmail.com" <eyal.birger@gmail.com>,
"tklauser@distanz.ch" <tklauser@distanz.ch>,
"fruggeri@aristanetworks.com" <fruggeri@aristanetworks.com>,
"dwmw2@infradead.org" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
PANKAJ MISHRA <pankaj.m@samsung.com>,
Geon-ho Kim <gh007.kim@samsung.com>,
Hak-Bong Lee <hakbong5.lee@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] af_packet: Raw socket destruction warning fix
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 01:13:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A6BA2D.2090604@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2036003091.741801453376409338.JavaMail.weblogic@ep2mlwas01a>
On 01/21/2016 12:40 PM, Maninder Singh wrote:
>> The other sock_put() in packet_release() to drop the final ref and call into
>> sk_free(), which drops the 1 ref on the sk_wmem_alloc from init time. Since you
>> got into __sk_free() via sock_wfree() destructor, your socket must have invoked
>> packet_release() prior to this (perhaps kernel destroying the process).
>>
>> What kernel do you use?
>
> Issue is coming for 3.10.58.
[ sorry for late reply ]
What driver are you using (is that in-tree)? Can you reproduce the same issue
with a latest -net kernel, for example (or, a 'reasonably' recent one like 4.3 or
4.4)? There has been quite a bit of changes in err queue handling (which also
accounts rmem) as well. How reliably can you trigger the issue? Does it trigger
with a completely different in-tree network driver as well with your tests? Would
be useful to track/debug sk_rmem_alloc increases/decreases to see from which path
new rmem is being charged in the time between packet_release() and packet_sock_destruct()
for that socket ...
>>> Driver calls dev_kfree_skb_any->dev_kfree_skb_irq
>>> and it adds buffer in completion queue to free and raises softirq NET_TX_SOFTIRQ
>>>
>>> net_tx_action->__kfree_skb->skb_release_all->skb_release_head_state->sock_wfree->
>>> __sk_free->packet_sock_destruct
>>>
>>> Also purging of receive queue has been taken care in other protocols.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-26 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-21 11:40 [PATCH] af_packet: Raw socket destruction warning fix Maninder Singh
2016-01-26 0:13 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-02-10 12:43 Vaneet Narang
2016-02-10 12:43 ` Vaneet Narang
2016-02-10 14:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-02-05 5:23 Vaneet Narang
2016-01-18 10:11 Vaneet Narang
2016-01-18 11:08 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-01-18 6:37 Maninder Singh
2016-01-18 9:44 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-01-18 10:29 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-02-05 11:26 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56A6BA2D.2090604@iogearbox.net \
--to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eyal.birger@gmail.com \
--cc=fruggeri@aristanetworks.com \
--cc=gh007.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=hakbong5.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maninder1.s@samsung.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pankaj.m@samsung.com \
--cc=tklauser@distanz.ch \
--cc=v.narang@samsung.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.