From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 339DAE00B9D; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 07:58:21 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.160.194 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-yk0-f194.google.com (mail-yk0-f194.google.com [209.85.160.194]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5D83E00B8B for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 07:58:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yk0-f194.google.com with SMTP id v14so14978607ykd.1 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 07:58:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cardoe-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=2gl4/fyrkLyC44Dum0n8FOEMdx6tnBEr+8024x3U/mk=; b=C0e02vG+LAfU6Dv8jjUUDF0INShF9fooPmpwlMaKTdOquQYfFJcZWhZxC6uKyZsB50 +01Qu2yvDvGl5VcxE1Ll5TPaFoBZCVr2/Cz/8xQ+swJxFG/IvlGgttdJmc3psPl05o5N 4YPAd93E88Czeyy2AGKKXwlene8ZzHftjiKOjWCJVsClEkJtVKHPymfQ3laY6eDccGcw EpL/iq38kesnKmhgSA2n6bfpCoKZKpsRKy2jOIsYivpLD9CvXOhRe+FeRjQTtu3kCtGp crF0NLspYX6XkFqDXfRDu9OxYrS2JdothTKA+hdUSaqxIOZP8YmCaHwmN+dMDamYs0eV OPnQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=2gl4/fyrkLyC44Dum0n8FOEMdx6tnBEr+8024x3U/mk=; b=UoZu0tbu0dCahrkNYthI2FwC5TzmTpkvmSJQ4bmVBPVpFrVVwC9EFHux1ESYp8MVKO mo1uqX3w9Pt/yXPJcKzITiHxgJtG6Kd1I/IOkZTGIg0KVJgnCaViFifkruaTzjnaqaP/ GopljPXRk7Bn3H8DG/8I67mOkqgbQ6IcR+0y16fxpFSts2NVnrCRN+Yt+5GuNDP5L/5z 7RnMzAOdmrlul7bYa9YAtHwvn9GwZqNQvsMPshedmLvvCBA+v/lPUYNCny6/L30F/4iU +48aiOfqejl0TelIMwIMn2B912cr8rdctsg83Ea5euPa4gyoO22wLRuMSO2RSQiHA/5b nbPA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQWY//dlaI5ui3uPoZxHRC9a9mffydNhJEs3fWQxhGLawGUxYc7RVb1VGrFH5w8fA== X-Received: by 10.37.39.69 with SMTP id n66mr12887529ybn.6.1453823897927; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 07:58:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from doug-macbook.lan (c-68-34-224-206.hsd1.al.comcast.net. [68.34.224.206]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id v130sm1294481ywe.24.2016.01.26.07.58.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 26 Jan 2016 07:58:16 -0800 (PST) To: Chris Patterson References: <1453735752-966-1-git-send-email-cardoe@cardoe.com> From: Doug Goldstein X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56A79794.5010402@cardoe.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:58:12 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: "meta-virtualization@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] xen: update git version to 4.6.x X-BeenThere: meta-virtualization@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of layer enabling hypervisor, virtualization tool stack, and cloud support" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 15:58:21 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 1715 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XXIqwlpC7DgVMbPDX6SHqwSSaTiRSvdOf" --XXIqwlpC7DgVMbPDX6SHqwSSaTiRSvdOf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 1/25/16 4:20 PM, Chris Patterson wrote: > I gave series a spin. Xen 4.6 built and ran nicely. On the git > version, I received: "Fetcher failure: Unable to find revision > 1fd615aa0108490ffc558d27627f509183cbfdaf in branch master even from > upstream" >=20 > Had to set branch=3Dstaging-4.6 to get it to fetch OK. With the rest o= f > this patch series applied, I also needed to move more of the common > bits into xen.inc to get it to build for x86_64. Any thoughts on > moving the EXTRA_OEMAKE, > xen-x86-Fix-up-rules-when-forcing-mno-sse.patch, and > do_install_append() to the .inc as well? >=20 > Cheers for the cleanup :) >=20 Yes. I actually have more patches and didn't include them for some reason. I'll repost. --=20 Doug Goldstein --XXIqwlpC7DgVMbPDX6SHqwSSaTiRSvdOf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWp5eXXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRBNTM5MEQ2RTNFMTkyNzlCNzVDMzIwOTVB MkJDMDNEQzg3RUQxQkQ0AAoJEKK8A9yH7RvUV6YP/2Nn1uZz1UnpbdJNSBFfeeiL /Umy8uhSLTjlllHZXoEPcLvkky7yx+cWaGAWKXDRI52k7bNCDZfN47OtpDqsarye FFcgAyCsd+hTatHpL147kI5LclzXoawnfUu7ApXtTXcN+y6Go4PPcO8rUXm2w9Tl vZ9YNLpsb/sXr40A2OlGjvoE6fnn7OqOHFK+chmnCjDlTNftWNrgqzcF7/VkviLD UH+qQOilSzVwXqXEr/U5bsOPu+/uZrGn0d2stkBAfxPmaIF0lOsGxpilUQARE81r SmQzf2kcqe75ajCT2jNDd6cQPkamdC6o8/C/uAdwxfxILdXAhbDRRQHk3feb3EUm 9YbYDtWIUFDZv6yL1jJ+xlRDCFj+UG3OlWSN6pkJA9hFLWpjrgit5Sh3YD4rUQFu kdw1y+x9lFJAFRY4Hr8vlNRF6QQT6f+MX1jPJKG8WE00+7V8X7qO2VT15xC7rKp9 mTcOQjoY0Da7+OI2cEunPpd+IxRmwaAK0ctJ64zx9ydQflFaP5piylwdfuoi9GWv JrcKxPi+lwSovvgKyaKcX5FTPRrjuFSGTeDeltMDyvorjg9DPlq66MIoFAuNe61N tcV6qMcrFrmEJ03XWOxEEr1Mof1dkwJuYRffdwcdZ7BXrZvOGhaH83+1Sb2I3AAs dXRXWKPxlJZJKP3Mguag =rJmb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XXIqwlpC7DgVMbPDX6SHqwSSaTiRSvdOf--