Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] merge-file: let conflict markers match end-of-line style of the context

[Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>]

On 26/01/16 08:54, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi Ramsay,
[snip]

>>
>> But you are only testing 3/4 conflict markers end in CR/LF. :-D
> 
> The fact that ||| markers are present is the fault of previous test cases.
> I tried to make a point of *not* relying on such a side effect (so as to
> debug failures quicker by commenting out all previous test cases).
> 
> So the fact that I am testing only 3 of the 4 conflict markers is very
> much by design.

I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you are trying to say here. :(

> 
>>> Read: I am uncertain that I want to spend the additional lines on
>>> testing more than actually necessary.
>>
>> If the here doc is too verbose for you, how about something like this
>> (totally untested):
>>
>>     test $(tr "\015" Q <crlf.txt | grep "^[<=>|].*Q$" | wc -l) -eq 4
>>
>> instead?
> 
> Hmm. I do not see the benefit over grepping for `txtQ$` it's essentially
> the same.

Well, as I said 'totally untested', but it _should_ be different. ;-)

The output from the 'tr "\015" Q <crlf.txt' subcommand should look
something like:

    1Q
    2Q
    <<<<<<< crlf-diff1.txtQ
    4Q
    ||||||| crlf-orig.txtQ
    3Q
    =======Q
    5Q
    >>>>>>> crlf-diff2.txtQ

so that your 'grep "\\.txtQ$"' should select these lines:

    <<<<<<< crlf-diff1.txtQ
    ||||||| crlf-orig.txtQ
    >>>>>>> crlf-diff2.txtQ

whereas my 'grep "^[<=>|].*Q$"' should select these lines:

    <<<<<<< crlf-diff1.txtQ
    ||||||| crlf-orig.txtQ
    =======Q
    >>>>>>> crlf-diff2.txtQ

(ie. select all 4 conflict markers).

> 
>> HTH
> 
> How the hell?

:-D Hope That Helps.

> 
>> ATB,
>> Ramsay Jones
> 
> Authorization to Buy?

All The Best.

ATB,
Ramsay Jones