From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wen Congyang Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 12/18] tools/libx{l, c}: add back channel to libxc Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 08:52:20 +0800 Message-ID: <56A814C4.5030901@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1451442548-26974-1-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com> <1451442548-26974-13-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com> <20160125194147.GR14977@char.us.oracle.com> <56A72865.5010906@cn.fujitsu.com> <20160126142939.GB19666@char.us.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160126142939.GB19666@char.us.oracle.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Lars Kurth , Changlong Xie , Wei Liu , Ian Campbell , Andrew Cooper , Jiang Yunhong , Ian Jackson , xen devel , Dong Eddie , Gui Jianfeng , Shriram Rajagopalan , Yang Hongyang List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 01/26/2016 10:29 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >>> Or is that suppose to be done in another patch? If so you may want to >>> mention that in the commit description? >> >> Do you mean where is the code that uses back_fd? It is in another series: >> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-12/msg02904.html > > Ah right that big patchset one. Hadn't looked at that yet - it is a bit hard > without having a git tree on which the foundation patches (this patch > series) are applied so I can look at the contents of the functions. Yes, I will provide a git tree to help review. Thanks Wen Congyang > > > > > . >