From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 09/25] tools/libx{l,
 c}: introduce should_checkpoint callback
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:03:39 +0800
Message-ID: <56A8176B.6000202@cn.fujitsu.com>
References: <1451443075-27428-1-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<1451443075-27428-10-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<20160126205032.GD27940@char.us.oracle.com>
	<20160126210950.GA28211@char.us.oracle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160126210950.GA28211@char.us.oracle.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@citrix.com>, Changlong Xie <xiecl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Jiang Yunhong <yunhong.jiang@intel.com>, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>, xen devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>, Dong Eddie <eddie.dong@intel.com>, Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>, Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@cs.ubc.ca>, Yang Hongyang <hongyang.yang@easystack.cn>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 01/27/2016 05:09 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 03:50:32PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 10:37:39AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
>>> Under COLO, we are doing checkpoint on demand, if this
>>> callback returns 1, we will take another checkpoint.
>>
>> So 1 means OK.
>>
>>> 0 indicates unexpected error.
>>
>> Why not return an error?
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Hongyang <hongyang.yang@easystack.cn>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
>>> ---
>>>  tools/libxc/include/xenguest.h     | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>  tools/libxl/libxl_save_msgs_gen.pl |  7 ++++---
>>>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/libxc/include/xenguest.h b/tools/libxc/include/xenguest.h
>>> index bd133af..88d6e13 100644
>>> --- a/tools/libxc/include/xenguest.h
>>> +++ b/tools/libxc/include/xenguest.h
>>> @@ -62,6 +62,15 @@ struct save_callbacks {
>>>       * 1: take another checkpoint */
>>>      int (*checkpoint)(void* data);
>>>  
>>> +    /*
>>> +     * Called after the checkpoint callback.
>>> +     *
>>> +     * returns:
>>> +     * 0: terminate checkpointing gracefully
>>
>> checkpointing terminated gracefully
>>
>> Why not return -EXX instead ?
>>
>>> +     * 1: take another checkpoint
> 
> Also perhaps the function instead of 'should_checkpoint' should just be
> called 'checkpoint' or 'do_checkpoint' ?

I will check it. IIRC, should_checkpoint() only wait for a new checkpoint.
If so, I think we can call it wait_checkpoint().

Thanks
Wen Congyang

> 
> 
> .
>