From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wen Congyang Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/25] docs/libxl: Introduce COLO_CONTEXT to support migration v2 colo streams Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:47:40 +0800 Message-ID: <56A8680C.9010407@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1451443075-27428-1-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com> <1451443075-27428-3-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com> <20160126204004.GA27940@char.us.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160126204004.GA27940@char.us.oracle.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Lars Kurth , Changlong Xie , Wei Liu , Ian Campbell , Andrew Cooper , Jiang Yunhong , Ian Jackson , xen devel , Dong Eddie , Gui Jianfeng , Shriram Rajagopalan , Yang Hongyang List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 01/27/2016 04:40 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 10:37:32AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote: >> It is the negotiation record for COLO. >> Primary->Secondary: >> control_id 0x00000000: Secondary VM is out of sync, start a new checkpoint >> Secondary->Primary: >> 0x00000001: Secondary VM is suspended >> 0x00000002: Secondary VM is ready >> 0x00000003: Secondary VM is resumed >> >> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang >> Signed-off-by: Yang Hongyang >> --- >> docs/specs/libxl-migration-stream.pandoc | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++-- >> tools/libxl/libxl_sr_stream_format.h | 11 +++++++++++ >> tools/python/xen/migration/libxl.py | 9 +++++++++ >> 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/docs/specs/libxl-migration-stream.pandoc b/docs/specs/libxl-migration-stream.pandoc >> index 2c97d86..5166d66 100644 >> --- a/docs/specs/libxl-migration-stream.pandoc >> +++ b/docs/specs/libxl-migration-stream.pandoc >> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ >> % LibXenLight Domain Image Format >> % Andrew Cooper <> >> -% Revision 1 >> +% Revision 2 >> >> Introduction >> ============ >> @@ -119,7 +119,9 @@ type 0x00000000: END >> >> 0x00000004: CHECKPOINT_END >> >> - 0x00000005 - 0x7FFFFFFF: Reserved for future _mandatory_ >> + 0x00000005: CHECKPOINT_STATE >> + >> + 0x00000006 - 0x7FFFFFFF: Reserved for future _mandatory_ > > This is in the 'mandatory' records. Should it be part of optional records? > > Would this checkpoint state always present on non-COLO guest migration? No. Will be fixed in the next version Thanks Wen Congyang > > > > . >