From: roopa <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Cc: David Wragg <david@weave.works>,
dev@openvswitch.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH net 1/2] vxlan: Relax the MTU constraint on vxlan devices
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 08:39:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A8F2DA.2030200@cumulusnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160110102836.GD1190@pox.localdomain>
On 1/10/16, 2:28 AM, Thomas Graf wrote:
> On 01/09/16 at 10:39am, roopa wrote:
>> On 1/6/16, 5:33 AM, David Wragg wrote:
>>> Allow the MTU of vxlan devices without an underlying device to be set to
>>> larger values (up to a maximum based on IP packet limits and vxlan
>>> overhead).
>>>
>>> Previously, their MTUs could not be set to higher than the conventional
>>> ethernet value of 1500. This is a very arbitrary value in the context
>>> of vxlan, and prevented such vxlan devices from being able to take
>>> advantage of jumbo frames etc.
>>>
>>> The default MTU remains 1500, for compatibility.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Wragg <david@weave.works>
>>>
>> Acked-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>
>>
>> I have an internal patch which does the same thing and
>> was hoping to post it soon.
>> I am not using ovs. so, I am not closely following the thread on the other
>> patch in the series. But, this patch certainly stands on its own and is required.
> Agreed. In fact the issue described is not OVS specific, anyone using a
> tunnel device in metadata mode benefits form this but is also exposed
> to the MTU issue.
>
> We either create a tunnel device for each underlay device and thus
> expose the baremetal MTU into the virtual network thus allowing for
> the L3 in the virtual network to check the MTU or we will not notice
> until we hit the underlay in which the context for the ICMP is much
> less useful.
>
> I'll think about how to solve this as discussed in the other portion
> of this thread as I assume you will be interested in a fix for this as
> well.
thanks thomas, will watch the thread. for now I need this for the vxlan netdevice on
my vxlan gateway. I don't really configure a default dst.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-27 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-06 13:33 [PATCH net 0/2] vxlan: Set a large MTU on ovs-created vxlan devices David Wragg
2016-01-06 13:33 ` [PATCH net 2/2] " David Wragg
[not found] ` <1452087186-12926-3-git-send-email-david-1SEAoVOfG6VEzL6FDj/jAg@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-07 11:36 ` Thomas Graf
[not found] ` <1452087186-12926-1-git-send-email-david-1SEAoVOfG6VEzL6FDj/jAg@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-06 13:33 ` [PATCH net 1/2] vxlan: Relax the MTU constraint on " David Wragg
[not found] ` <1452087186-12926-2-git-send-email-david-1SEAoVOfG6VEzL6FDj/jAg@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-07 11:24 ` Thomas Graf
2016-01-07 11:31 ` David Wragg
2016-01-07 11:50 ` Thomas Graf
2016-01-09 18:39 ` roopa
2016-01-10 10:28 ` [ovs-dev] " Thomas Graf
2016-01-27 16:39 ` roopa [this message]
2016-01-06 20:59 ` [PATCH net 0/2] vxlan: Set a large MTU on ovs-created " David Miller
[not found] ` <20160106.155950.1007160228570301281.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-06 22:53 ` Jesse Gross
2016-01-06 23:25 ` David Wragg
2016-01-06 23:57 ` [ovs-dev] " Jesse Gross
2016-01-07 0:14 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-01-07 0:46 ` Jesse Gross
2016-01-07 11:49 ` Thomas Graf
[not found] ` <20160107114935.GJ32456-4EA/1caXOu0mYvmMESoHnA@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-07 16:35 ` Jesse Gross
2016-01-07 17:21 ` [ovs-dev] " Thomas Graf
2016-01-07 17:50 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
[not found] ` <568EA55A.7070305-tFNcAqjVMyqKXQKiL6tip0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-07 18:40 ` Thomas Graf
[not found] ` <20160107184042.GB24672-4EA/1caXOu0mYvmMESoHnA@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-08 21:29 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-01-10 10:49 ` [ovs-dev] " Thomas Graf
[not found] ` <CAEh+42iWSZOyikNydU2Bs8meqYfrKfUJLDGFJ8HzQ06k64LP0g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-07 0:29 ` David Wragg
[not found] ` <86wprmp6z6.fsf-1SEAoVOfG6VEzL6FDj/jAg@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-07 1:10 ` Jesse Gross
2016-01-07 21:47 ` David Miller
2016-01-07 23:42 ` David Wragg
2016-01-08 2:48 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56A8F2DA.2030200@cumulusnetworks.com \
--to=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=david@weave.works \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.