From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa@igel.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/5] virtio: Extend virtio-net PMD to
 support container environment
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 11:47:59 +0900
Message-ID: <56A9815F.6040205@igel.co.jp>
References: <1453108389-21006-2-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp>
 <1453374478-30996-6-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp>
 <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B4C5B2D0D@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: "Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
 "yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com" <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>,
 "Tan, Jianfeng" <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com (mail-pa0-f47.google.com
 [209.85.220.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ADFEC166
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 03:48:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-pa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id ho8so14878920pac.2
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 18:48:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B4C5B2D0D@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On 2016/01/28 1:45, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> On 1/21/2016 7:09 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>> +qtest_find_pci_device(struct qtest_session *s, uint16_t bus, uint8_t device)
>> +{
>> +	struct qtest_pci_device *dev;
>> +	uint32_t val;
>> +
>> +	val = qtest_pci_inl(s, bus, device, 0, 0);
>> +	TAILQ_FOREACH(dev, &s->head, next) {
>> +		if (val == ((uint32_t)dev->device_id << 16 | dev->vendor_id)) {
>> +			dev->bus_addr = bus;
>> +			dev->device_addr = device;
>> +			return;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int
>> +qtest_init_pci_devices(struct qtest_session *s)
>> +{
>> +	struct qtest_pci_device *dev;
>> +	uint16_t bus;
>> +	uint8_t device;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	/* Find devices */
>> +	bus = 0;
>> +	do {
>> +		device = 0;
>> +		do {
>> +			qtest_find_pci_device(s, bus, device);
>> +		} while (device++ != NB_DEVICE - 1);
>> +	} while (bus++ != NB_BUS - 1);
> Seems this scan of all the pci devices is very time consuming operation,
> and each scan involves socket communication.
> Do you measure how long it takes to do the pci devices initialization?

I measured it, and seems it takes 0.35 seconds in my environment.
This will be done only once when the port is initialized. Probably it's
not so heady.

Tetsuya