From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 00FA5E00948; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 01:30:00 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, * medium trust * [147.11.1.11 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6EE6E00838 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 01:29:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.15.2/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id u0S9Tuta007125 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 28 Jan 2016 01:29:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from [128.224.162.155] (128.224.162.155) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 01:29:55 -0800 To: "Burton, Ross" References: <1453818056-6498-1-git-send-email-ross.burton@intel.com> <56A9CA3B.4000704@windriver.com> From: Robert Yang Message-ID: <56A9DF92.2090007@windriver.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 17:29:54 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: Poky Project Subject: Re: [PATCH] conf/distro/poky.conf: use google.com for connectivity check X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion & patch submission for meta-yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:30:01 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/28/2016 05:17 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 28 January 2016 at 07:58, Robert Yang > wrote: > > Sorry, but google.com is nearly unreachable in China as > the reason you may know. > > How about 8.8.8.8 which is OK ? > > > That's a good point which I should have thought of. I'm surprised the Great > Firewall lets 8.8.8.8 through, but as this check uses the fetcher there needs to > be a HTTP URL it can open and 8.8.8.8 doesn't respond to HTTP. It seems that 8.8.8.8 doesn't repond to HTTP. How about example.org which is reserved by RFC ? In the USA: $ ping example.org PING example.org (93.184.216.34) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 93.184.216.34: icmp_req=1 ttl=52 time=5.82 ms 64 bytes from 93.184.216.34: icmp_req=2 ttl=52 time=5.25 ms $ ping google.com PING google.com (216.58.219.14) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from lax17s03-in-f14.1e100.net (216.58.219.14): icmp_req=1 ttl=54 time=12.2 ms 64 bytes from lax17s03-in-f14.1e100.net (216.58.219.14): icmp_req=2 ttl=54 time=11.8 ms $ ping yoctoproject.org PING yoctoproject.org (140.211.169.56) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (140.211.169.56): icmp_req=1 ttl=53 time=26.6 ms 64 bytes from yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (140.211.169.56): icmp_req=2 ttl=53 time=26.0 ms The example.org is faster than google.com and yoctoproject.org. In China, example.org is also OK. $ ping example.org PING example.org (93.184.216.34) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 93.184.216.34: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=155 ms 64 bytes from 93.184.216.34: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=158 ms $ ping google.com PING google.com (216.58.221.142) 56(84) bytes of data. [no respond] $ ping yoctoproject.org PING yoctoproject.org (140.211.169.56) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (140.211.169.56): icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=336 ms 64 bytes from yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (140.211.169.56): icmp_seq=4 ttl=49 time=397 ms // Robert > > Ross