From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37573) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aPCNH-0000Tu-Pw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 11:58:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aPCND-0005B6-NJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 11:58:19 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:56001) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aPCND-0005B2-I0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 11:58:15 -0500 References: <1445361732-16257-1-git-send-email-shlomopongratz@gmail.com> From: Christopher Covington Message-ID: <56AB9A22.7020201@codeaurora.org> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 11:58:10 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1445361732-16257-1-git-send-email-shlomopongratz@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC V5 0/9] Implement GIC-500 from GICv3 family for arm64 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Shlomo Pongratz , peter.maydell@linaro.org, Shlomo Pongratz Cc: eric.auger@linaro.org, p.fedin@samsung.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, shannon.zhao@linaro.org, ashoks@broadcom.com, imammedo@redhat.com On 10/20/2015 01:22 PM, Shlomo Pongratz wrote: > From: Shlomo Pongratz > > This patch is a first step multicores support for arm64. > > This implemntation was tested up to 100 cores. > > Things left to do: > > Support SPI, ITS and ITS CONTROL, note that this patch porpose is to enable > running multi cores using the "virt" virtual machine and this goal is achived > without that. > > Add GICv2 backwards competability. Since there is a GICv2 implementation I > can't see the pusprose for it. > > Special thanks to Peter Crostwaite whose patch to th Linux (kernel) i.e. > Implement cpu_relax as yield solved the problem of the boot process getting > stuck for 24 cores and more. > > Figure out why virtual machine name changed from virt-v3 to virt-v3-machine Hi Shlomo, Were you planning on another revision of this patchset? Are there any things you would like help with? Peter, Do you have any thoughts about what is essential and what isn't for a first wave of TCG GICv3 patches to be mergeable? Thanks, Christopher Covington -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project