From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laxman Dewangan Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 2/8] mfd: max77620: add core driver for MAX77620/MAX20024 Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 14:45:47 +0530 Message-ID: <56AF2243.50305@nvidia.com> References: <201601310157.sKXyINX7%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <56ACEEE1.1050800@nvidia.com> <20160201082553.GW3368@x1> <56AF17D6.2090106@nvidia.com> <20160201090239.GB3368@x1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160201090239.GB3368@x1> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Lee Jones Cc: kbuild test robot , kbuild-all-JC7UmRfGjtg@public.gmane.org, robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org, galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org, linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, gnurou-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, a.zummo-BfzFCNDTiLLj+vYz1yj4TQ@public.gmane.org, alexandre.belloni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org, lgirdwood-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-gpio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, rtc-linux-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org, swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, treding-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, k.kozlowski-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org, vreddytalla-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, Mallikarjun Kasoju List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Monday 01 February 2016 02:32 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 01 Feb 2016, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > >> On Monday 01 February 2016 01:55 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >>> On Sat, 30 Jan 2016, Laxman Dewangan wrote: >>> >>>> This depends on patch >>>> [PATCH V2] mfd: core: add macro for adding mfd cells >>>> >>>> and due to absence of this patch, it reports the error. >>> If you have dependencies, why aren't they in this set? >>> >> This change is not related to the series as such and so independent. >> I just thought that mentioning on commit log will be fine here. May >> be I missed some points here. > If you have patches which use/depend on it, then it's not so > independent, right? Hmm.. true. I had different thought that the core header is independent as it does not depends on other but this series dependent which depends on core header. Seems something I missed. Idea was to review md header independently and used on this series. >> Let me know if I need to add this to back on series. > > In order to avoid any mishaps, that would be preferable, yes. > I will respin this series to V8 once I will have change from you per discussion on other email. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hqemgate14.nvidia.com (hqemgate14.nvidia.com. [216.228.121.143]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id tn7si3450684pac.1.2016.02.01.01.27.03 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Feb 2016 01:27:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <56AF2243.50305@nvidia.com> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 14:45:47 +0530 From: Laxman Dewangan MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lee Jones CC: kbuild test robot , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Mallikarjun Kasoju Subject: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH V7 2/8] mfd: max77620: add core driver for MAX77620/MAX20024 References: <201601310157.sKXyINX7%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <56ACEEE1.1050800@nvidia.com> <20160201082553.GW3368@x1> <56AF17D6.2090106@nvidia.com> <20160201090239.GB3368@x1> In-Reply-To: <20160201090239.GB3368@x1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Reply-To: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , On Monday 01 February 2016 02:32 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 01 Feb 2016, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > >> On Monday 01 February 2016 01:55 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >>> On Sat, 30 Jan 2016, Laxman Dewangan wrote: >>> >>>> This depends on patch >>>> [PATCH V2] mfd: core: add macro for adding mfd cells >>>> >>>> and due to absence of this patch, it reports the error. >>> If you have dependencies, why aren't they in this set? >>> >> This change is not related to the series as such and so independent. >> I just thought that mentioning on commit log will be fine here. May >> be I missed some points here. > If you have patches which use/depend on it, then it's not so > independent, right? Hmm.. true. I had different thought that the core header is independent as it does not depends on other but this series dependent which depends on core header. Seems something I missed. Idea was to review md header independently and used on this series. >> Let me know if I need to add this to back on series. > > In order to avoid any mishaps, that would be preferable, yes. > I will respin this series to V8 once I will have change from you per discussion on other email. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux". Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux . Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist before submitting a driver. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752672AbcBAJ1G (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Feb 2016 04:27:06 -0500 Received: from hqemgate14.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.143]:1999 "EHLO hqemgate14.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751416AbcBAJ1E (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Feb 2016 04:27:04 -0500 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqnvupgp07.nvidia.com on Mon, 01 Feb 2016 01:27:15 -0800 Message-ID: <56AF2243.50305@nvidia.com> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 14:45:47 +0530 From: Laxman Dewangan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lee Jones CC: kbuild test robot , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Mallikarjun Kasoju Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 2/8] mfd: max77620: add core driver for MAX77620/MAX20024 References: <201601310157.sKXyINX7%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <56ACEEE1.1050800@nvidia.com> <20160201082553.GW3368@x1> <56AF17D6.2090106@nvidia.com> <20160201090239.GB3368@x1> In-Reply-To: <20160201090239.GB3368@x1> X-Originating-IP: [10.19.65.30] X-ClientProxiedBy: DRUKMAIL101.nvidia.com (10.25.59.19) To bgmail102.nvidia.com (10.25.59.11) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 01 February 2016 02:32 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 01 Feb 2016, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > >> On Monday 01 February 2016 01:55 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >>> On Sat, 30 Jan 2016, Laxman Dewangan wrote: >>> >>>> This depends on patch >>>> [PATCH V2] mfd: core: add macro for adding mfd cells >>>> >>>> and due to absence of this patch, it reports the error. >>> If you have dependencies, why aren't they in this set? >>> >> This change is not related to the series as such and so independent. >> I just thought that mentioning on commit log will be fine here. May >> be I missed some points here. > If you have patches which use/depend on it, then it's not so > independent, right? Hmm.. true. I had different thought that the core header is independent as it does not depends on other but this series dependent which depends on core header. Seems something I missed. Idea was to review md header independently and used on this series. >> Let me know if I need to add this to back on series. > > In order to avoid any mishaps, that would be preferable, yes. > I will respin this series to V8 once I will have change from you per discussion on other email.