From: "Yu, Zhang" <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, wei.liu2@citrix.com,
ian.campbell@citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com,
andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Paul.Durrant@citrix.com,
zhiyuan.lv@intel.com, keir@xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] tools: introduce parameter max_wp_ram_ranges.
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 00:37:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56AF89BA.4060105@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56AF977602000078000CD1BE@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
On 2/2/2016 12:35 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 01.02.16 at 17:19, <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> After a second thought, I guess one of the security concern
>> is when some APP is trying to trigger the HVMOP_set_param
>> directly with some illegal values.
>
> Not sure what "directly" is supposed to mean here.
>
I mean with no validation by itself, like libxc...
>> So, we need also validate this param in hvm_allow_set_param,
>> current although hvm_allow_set_param has not performed any
>> validation other parameters. We need to do this for the new
>> ones. Is this understanding correct?
>
> Yes.
>
>> Another question is: as to the tool stack side, do you think
>> an error message would suffice? Shouldn't xl be terminated?
>
> I have no idea what consistent behavior in such a case would
> be - I'll defer input on this to the tool stack maintainers.
>
Thank you.
Wei, which one do you prefer?
Yu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-01 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 109+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-29 10:45 [PATCH v12 0/3] Refactor ioreq server for better performance Yu Zhang
2016-01-29 10:45 ` [PATCH v12 1/3] Refactor rangeset structure " Yu Zhang
2016-01-29 10:45 ` [PATCH v12 2/3] Differentiate IO/mem resources tracked by ioreq server Yu Zhang
2016-01-29 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] tools: introduce parameter max_wp_ram_ranges Yu Zhang
2016-01-29 16:33 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-30 14:38 ` Yu, Zhang
2016-02-01 7:52 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-01 12:02 ` Wei Liu
2016-02-01 12:15 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-01 12:49 ` Wei Liu
2016-02-01 13:07 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-01 15:14 ` Yu, Zhang
2016-02-01 16:16 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-01 16:33 ` Yu, Zhang
2016-02-01 16:19 ` Yu, Zhang
2016-02-01 16:35 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-01 16:37 ` Yu, Zhang [this message]
2016-02-01 17:05 ` Ian Jackson
2016-02-02 8:04 ` Yu, Zhang
2016-02-02 11:51 ` Wei Liu
2016-02-02 13:56 ` Yu, Zhang
2016-02-02 10:32 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-02 10:56 ` Yu, Zhang
2016-02-02 11:12 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-02 14:01 ` Yu, Zhang
2016-02-02 14:42 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-02 15:00 ` Yu, Zhang
2016-02-02 15:21 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-02 15:19 ` Yu, Zhang
2016-02-03 7:10 ` Yu, Zhang
2016-02-03 8:32 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-03 12:20 ` Paul Durrant
2016-02-03 12:35 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-03 12:50 ` Paul Durrant
2016-02-03 13:00 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-03 13:07 ` Paul Durrant
2016-02-03 13:17 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-03 13:18 ` Paul Durrant
2016-02-03 14:43 ` Ian Jackson
2016-02-03 15:10 ` Paul Durrant
2016-02-03 17:50 ` George Dunlap
2016-02-04 8:50 ` Yu, Zhang
2016-02-03 17:41 ` George Dunlap
2016-02-03 18:21 ` George Dunlap
2016-02-03 18:26 ` George Dunlap
2016-02-03 18:39 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-03 19:12 ` George Dunlap
2016-02-04 8:51 ` Yu, Zhang
2016-02-04 10:49 ` George Dunlap
2016-02-04 11:08 ` Ian Campbell
2016-02-04 11:19 ` Ian Campbell
2016-02-04 8:50 ` Yu, Zhang
2016-02-04 9:28 ` Paul Durrant
2016-02-04 9:38 ` Yu, Zhang
2016-02-04 9:49 ` Paul Durrant
2016-02-04 10:34 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-04 13:33 ` Ian Jackson
2016-02-04 13:47 ` Paul Durrant
2016-02-04 14:12 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-04 14:25 ` Paul Durrant
2016-02-04 15:06 ` Ian Jackson
2016-02-04 15:51 ` Paul Durrant
2016-02-05 3:47 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-02-05 3:35 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-02-04 14:08 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-04 17:12 ` George Dunlap
2016-02-05 4:18 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-02-05 8:41 ` Yu, Zhang
2016-02-05 8:32 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-05 9:24 ` Paul Durrant
2016-02-05 10:41 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-05 11:14 ` George Dunlap
2016-02-05 11:24 ` Paul Durrant
2016-02-16 7:22 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-02-16 8:50 ` Paul Durrant
2016-02-16 10:33 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-16 11:11 ` Paul Durrant
2016-02-17 3:18 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-02-17 8:58 ` Paul Durrant
2016-02-17 9:32 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 9:58 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-02-17 10:03 ` Paul Durrant
2016-02-17 10:22 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 10:24 ` Paul Durrant
2016-02-17 10:25 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-02-17 11:01 ` George Dunlap
2016-02-17 11:12 ` Paul Durrant
2016-02-22 15:56 ` George Dunlap
2016-02-22 16:02 ` Paul Durrant
2016-02-22 16:45 ` George Dunlap
2016-02-22 17:01 ` Paul Durrant
2016-02-22 17:23 ` George Dunlap
2016-02-22 17:34 ` Paul Durrant
2016-02-05 8:41 ` Yu, Zhang
2016-02-04 11:06 ` George Dunlap
2016-02-05 2:01 ` Zhiyuan Lv
2016-02-05 3:44 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-02-05 8:38 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-05 11:05 ` George Dunlap
2016-02-05 15:13 ` Zhiyuan Lv
2016-02-05 20:14 ` George Dunlap
2016-02-05 8:40 ` Yu, Zhang
2016-02-04 10:06 ` Ian Campbell
2016-02-05 3:31 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-02-02 11:31 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-02 11:43 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-02 14:20 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-01 11:57 ` Wei Liu
2016-02-01 15:15 ` Yu, Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56AF89BA.4060105@linux.intel.com \
--to=yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=Paul.Durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
--cc=zhiyuan.lv@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.