From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 48D36E0079A; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:10:51 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.220.52 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com (mail-pa0-f52.google.com [209.85.220.52]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C746E00444 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:10:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id yy13so85776821pab.3 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 10:10:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mvista-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Mn8XUGk9W/zKqFAqwjkTAa6MjQsEH/Drf3oXc80bsRQ=; b=DxpwAgCIcSR9WviVzaUi0cbxvB9zTP4okJZ+qo0UCUJjwgzc3fDo2T7nqIPYkS3oUr aqry+aN+UD0c3tAKnrkoSzAeLJTyqDG40EaV3w82SswXZXgaxt3oNHu5PIkcnq7MQ4uS X95XWkxQF8/kQpWRR2UsXrbTVm92N2uPN19M+V8RYTY6X3A/VGck4Zw1kunFyivFodxo 4X+hiztwlbGjEcc5pW1pnB+3LgFfUz9Sq5oO3iEI6CK2MP9h2WL2ysrpTw+vUyn7K6KX soZj/iFdbkKZ0Er1ghQWNVGMxyBBuZL+2E/qre0GhObXvOWHc2wYigHxpVdI6KnGVl1O t0Fg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Mn8XUGk9W/zKqFAqwjkTAa6MjQsEH/Drf3oXc80bsRQ=; b=mKLOTqzu2fCZhXaw+QN/8o/1IBclmptJW/I8V+C2r6l/evlayFeJMOfpiHaxCsx8id XEMwdMUkCOBY8ARGog9PqR2QZaDbrMZ0EzfXsKA/EC6/fSFT/2YowKSW/5L36c3wmu+l sqGMHnoRcXEmoMwCSMXkT1e5ccdB2jGcBItUkwNkBy+s5ebrffdAYnGRoqPwBZsNuOUh wWCTE8QPeJ6bEH2KSqqR/dgDx19wa4w7ozz9JNBIdEBaQL7HCAW8jPUqnrgr/4wp4SDw vJPfdSUrjBBfR//VRhvdvEkNMXQ8b6is8FS0cZuXZ3rc9l4NPyC77SmQZ66HlIIjSU2Z mykA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSsTt8X6LUnRrIsgZVGST7TYEze+bP/YXgrDX3EFjnUOq5xxaGUgGitvGC/158E5B0F X-Received: by 10.66.150.37 with SMTP id uf5mr40528635pab.30.1454350249849; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 10:10:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:202:4000:1239:20d2:e542:abc0:b8a2? ([2601:202:4000:1239:20d2:e542:abc0:b8a2]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id m86sm44784652pfi.27.2016.02.01.10.10.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 01 Feb 2016 10:10:49 -0800 (PST) To: Khem Raj , openembedded-architecture , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer , "yocto@yoctoproject.org" , openembeded-devel References: From: akuster Message-ID: <56AF9FA4.8050603@mvista.com> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:10:44 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Glibc 2.24 _might_ require minimum kernel version 3.2 X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 18:10:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/31/2016 09:41 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > Hi > > This is FYI, as I have sent a RFT for glibc 2.24, there might be another change > coming which is under discussion on glibc mailing lists which is on > supported minimum > kernel version bump to 3.2 since 2.6.32 will be EOLed this summer [1] > > If anyone is planning on using upcoming yocto/OE release and sticking > to kernels older than 3.2 then please plan for upgrading your kernel. Nope. - armin > > Thanks > -Khem > > [1] - https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-01/msg00885.html >