From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43570)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1aQjFw-0006RT-SZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 17:17:05 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1aQjFr-0005Sv-Kx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 17:17:04 -0500
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
References: <56B10B86.4020505@redhat.com> <56B126B6.3070701@redhat.com>
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <56B12AD7.90802@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 23:16:55 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56B126B6.3070701@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] iotest 013 failure under clang -fsanitize=undefined
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>, Qemu-block <qemu-block@nongnu.org>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>



On 02/02/2016 22:59, Eric Blake wrote:
> I'd be okay with this patch, if you want to make it a formal
> submission, and if no one else chimes in with any opinion other
> than disgust at clang's shenanigans.

I'm not okay with the patch.  What's wrong with
-fno-sanitize=float-divide-by-zero?  GCC accepts it, the only
difference is in having a more useful default.

Paolo