All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Durgin <jdurgin@redhat.com>
To: Mark Nelson <mnelson@redhat.com>,
	"Moreno, Orlando" <orlando.moreno@intel.com>,
	"ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Blinick, Stephen L" <stephen.l.blinick@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Infernalis on NVMe cephx authentication impact
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 17:53:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B15DA5.3010505@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56B14F6B.7050405@redhat.com>

On 02/02/2016 04:52 PM, Mark Nelson wrote:
> Hi Orlando,
>
> Hrm, looks like https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3896 didn't make it
> into Hammer at release. :(  That might also account for a large part of
> the performance disparity.  Coincidentally Josh Durgin made a branch
> with the PR backported to hammer a couple of weeks ago here:
>
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/wip-auth-hammer

Turns out it fixes a bug [0] in addition to being faster, so expect it
in a future hammer release.

Has anyone measured the overhead of message signing (the 'cephx sign 
messages' option)? It's on by default with cephx, but can be disabled
separately. What auth settings were these tests using?

It may be worth requiring message signatures by default now that it's
been supported in the kernel client since 3.19.

Josh

[0] http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14620

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-03  1:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-03  0:18 Infernalis on NVMe cephx authentication impact Moreno, Orlando
2016-02-03  0:52 ` Mark Nelson
2016-02-03  1:53   ` Josh Durgin [this message]
2016-02-03  2:30     ` Somnath Roy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56B15DA5.3010505@redhat.com \
    --to=jdurgin@redhat.com \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mnelson@redhat.com \
    --cc=orlando.moreno@intel.com \
    --cc=stephen.l.blinick@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.