From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: CephFS and the next hammer release v0.94.6 Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 11:52:03 +0700 Message-ID: <56B18773.6000304@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:34907 "EHLO relay4-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755468AbcBCEwM (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2016 23:52:12 -0500 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Gregory Farnum Cc: Ceph Development , Nathan Cutler Hi Greg, The next hammer release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/h= ammer passed the fs suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13356#note-25= ). A more recent run showed 3 failures and I'm not sure how to interpre= t them ( http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2016-01-29_03:02:05-fs-hammer---b= asic-multi/ ). Do you think the hammer branch is ready for QE to start their own round= of testing ? Or should the above errors be investigated first ? Cheers --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html