From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Yuki Shibuya <shibuya.yk@ncos.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86: change PIT discard tick policy
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 17:48:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B22F67.2000509@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454516585-28491-4-git-send-email-rkrcmar@redhat.com>
On 03/02/2016 17:23, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> Discard policy uses ack_notifiers to prevent injection of PIT interrupts
> before EOI from the last one.
>
> This patch changes the policy to always try to deliver the interrupt,
> which makes a difference when its vector is in ISR.
> Old implementation would drop the interrupt, but proposed one injects to
> IRR, like real hardware would.
>
> The old policy breaks legacy NMI watchdogs, where PIT is used through
> virtual wire (LVT0): PIT never sends an interrupt before receiving EOI,
> thus a guest deadlock with disabled interrupts will stop NMIs.
>
> Note that NMI doesn't do EOI, so PIT also had to send a normal interrupt
> through IOAPIC. (KVM's PIT is deeply rotten and luckily not used much
> in modern systems.)
>
> Even though there is a chance of regressions, I think we can fix the
> LVT0 NMI bug without introducing a new tick policy.
>
> Reported-by: Yuki Shibuya <shibuya.yk@ncos.nec.co.jp>
> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Haven't looked at the patch yet, but this is definitely how DISCARD is
supposed to work.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-03 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-03 16:23 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86: change and fix PIT discard tick policy Radim Krčmář
2016-02-03 16:23 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86: fix interrupt dropping race in PIT Radim Krčmář
2016-02-04 13:35 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-02-03 16:23 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86: refactor PIT state inject_lock Radim Krčmář
2016-02-03 16:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-04 13:13 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-02-03 16:23 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86: change PIT discard tick policy Radim Krčmář
2016-02-03 16:48 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-02-03 16:23 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86: remove notifiers from PIT discard policy Radim Krčmář
2016-02-03 16:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-04 13:15 ` Radim Krčmář
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56B22F67.2000509@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=shibuya.yk@ncos.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.