All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
To: Wei Huang <wei@redhat.com>,
	Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Cc: QEMU Trivial <qemu-trivial@nongnu.org>,
	QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH 1/1] arm: virt: change GPIO trigger interrupt to pulse
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:51:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B2F4E3.6010807@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56B2EB3E.2000908@redhat.com>



On 2016/2/4 14:10, Wei Huang wrote:
> 
> On 02/03/2016 07:44 PM, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>> > 
>> > 
>> > On 2016/2/4 0:01, Wei Huang wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> On 2/3/16 04:46, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>>>> >>>> On 3 February 2016 at 07:15, Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>>> 28.01.2016 21:22, Wei Huang wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When QEMU is hook'ed up with libvirt/virsh, the first ACPI reboot
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> request will succeed; but the following shutdown/reboot requests
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> fail to trigger VMs to react. Notice that in mach-virt machine
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> model GPIO is defined as edge-triggered and active-high in ACPI.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This patch changes the behavior of powerdown notifier from PULLUP
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> to PULSE. It solves the problem described above (i.e. reboot
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> continues to work).
>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>> So, what's the outcome of this? :)
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> This patch is definitely wrong. The patch to fix up the
>>>>> >>>> gpio reset stuff is definitely the right idea. Whether it
>>>>> >>>> fixes the reported failure or some further change is also
>>>>> >>>> needed is currently unclear.
>>> >> I will NAK this one for now. Please see V2 patch, which is necessary. In
>>> >> the meanwhile, I think there is a problem with pulling-up only in
>>> >> current implementation. Let me debug Shannon's DT problem first.
>>> >>
>> > Hi Wei,
>> > 
>> > The reason of DT problem is that when we use qemu_irq_pulse(i.e
>> > qemu_set_irq(qdev_get_gpio_in(pl061_dev, 3), 1);
>> > qemu_set_irq(qdev_get_gpio_in(pl061_dev, 3), 0);), it will inject the
>> > GPIO interrupt until it executes
>> > qemu_set_irq(qdev_get_gpio_in(pl061_dev, 3), 0) because the qemu main
>> > thread is serialized and then guest will get the button value as zero,
>> > so it's failed to report the input event.
>> > 
>> > See gpio_keys_gpio_report_event
>> >  in drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c
>> > int state = gpio_get_value_cansleep(button->gpio);
>> > 
>> > The state is always zero.
> I reversed the order of edge pulling. The state is 1 according to printk
> inside gpio_keys driver. However the reboot still failed with two
> reboots (1 very early, 1 later).
> 
Because to make the input work, it should call input_event twice I think.

input_event(input, type, button->code, 1) means the button pressed
input_event(input, type, button->code, 0) means the button released

But We only see guest entering gpio_keys_gpio_report_event once.

My original purpose is like below:

call qemu_set_irq(qdev_get_gpio_in(pl061_dev, 3), 1) to make guest
execute input_event(input, type, button->code, 1)
call qemu_set_irq(qdev_get_gpio_in(pl061_dev, 3), 0) to make guest
execute input_event(input, type, button->code, 0).

But even though it calls qemu_set_irq twice, it only calls pl061_update
once in qemu.

-- 
Shannon



  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-04  6:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-28 18:22 [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH 1/1] arm: virt: change GPIO trigger interrupt to pulse Wei Huang
2016-01-29 10:10 ` Shannon Zhao
2016-01-29 14:35   ` Wei Huang
2016-01-29 14:46     ` Shannon Zhao
2016-01-29 14:50       ` Wei Huang
2016-01-29 15:22         ` Shannon Zhao
2016-01-29 14:50       ` Peter Maydell
2016-01-29 15:13         ` Wei Huang
2016-01-29 15:29           ` Peter Maydell
2016-02-01 10:17           ` [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] " Igor Mammedov
2016-02-01 17:24             ` Wei Huang
2016-01-30  8:18     ` [Qemu-trivial] " Shannon Zhao
2016-02-03  7:15 ` Michael Tokarev
2016-02-03 10:46   ` Peter Maydell
2016-02-03 16:01     ` Wei Huang
2016-02-04  1:44       ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-04  6:10         ` Wei Huang
2016-02-04  6:51           ` Shannon Zhao [this message]
2016-02-09 22:59             ` Wei Huang
2016-02-20 10:53               ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-24 22:22                 ` Wei Huang
2016-02-26 12:31                   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-26 12:53                     ` [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] " Peter Maydell
2016-02-26 14:54                       ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-26 15:06                         ` Peter Maydell
2016-02-26 15:28                           ` Wei Huang
2016-02-26 15:42                             ` Peter Maydell
2016-02-27  1:55                               ` Shannon Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56B2F4E3.6010807@huawei.com \
    --to=zhaoshenglong@huawei.com \
    --cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
    --cc=shannon.zhao@linaro.org \
    --cc=wei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.