From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id C764FE00CC5; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 12:55:40 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high * trust * [63.239.67.9 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from emvm-gh1-uea08.nsa.gov (emvm-gh1-uea08.nsa.gov [63.239.67.9]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725A7E00CC2 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 12:55:36 -0800 (PST) X-TM-IMSS-Message-ID: <8512b1010003df6b@nsa.gov> Received: from tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil ([144.51.242.1]) by nsa.gov ([10.208.42.193]) with ESMTP (TREND IMSS SMTP Service 7.1) id 8512b1010003df6b ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:55:24 -0500 Received: from moss-wolfpack.infosec.tycho.ncsc.mil (moss-wolfpack [192.168.25.76]) by tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u14KtZ58006627; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:55:35 -0500 To: Chris Patterson References: <56B10C90.8070709@tycho.nsa.gov> <56B126BC.3070304@tycho.nsa.gov> From: "M. Gregory" Message-ID: <56B3BA85.7020008@tycho.nsa.gov> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:54:29 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-TM-AS-MML: disable Cc: "meta-virtualization@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: stubs-32.h not found X-BeenThere: meta-virtualization@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of layer enabling hypervisor, virtualization tool stack, and cloud support" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 20:55:40 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/04/2016 03:52 PM, Chris Patterson wrote: > I repro'd this with a fresh tree. Instead of the depends approach, I > simply moved the step between do_configure and do_compile, which > should be OK? > > diff --git a/recipes-extended/xen/xen.inc b/recipes-extended/xen/xen.inc > index 5555ed3..d35bc3f 100644 > --- a/recipes-extended/xen/xen.inc > +++ b/recipes-extended/xen/xen.inc > @@ -782,7 +782,7 @@ do_stubs() { > fi > } > > -addtask stubs after do_patch before do_configure > +addtask stubs after do_configure before do_compile > > do_configure() { yes.